• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Post deleted by Basil

Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

Wilkommen, mein freund,
savewave.gif

I've been traveling and missed your post. I developed my lifelong love of sports cars in the five years I lived in Germany (age 12 to 17). I've been back a number ov times in the intervening 40 years and the country is even more beautiful than in those difficult post-war years. You must enjoy the roads, the air, and the scenery. Don't let the Christmas rush make your total image of the forum; we really are a friendly bunch.
Auf wiedersehen, bis bald.
Alan
cheers.gif
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

Hi Junior
I read your original post and I have no experience with the Barratt conversion but will say that on my 4.2, the electronic ignition conversion from lumination has been great. A high output coil ,like Lucas Sport, seems to be necessary to make the system work properly though. It makes it very easy to set the timing compared to the old points system and fits inside the original cap.
I know over here , we LBC lovers often have to put up with scorn from Porsche owners who just don't understand the attraction. How is it for you ? Do autophyles there appriciate your cat?
Welcome to the forum, glad to have another Jag owner on board.
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

Ja, ist mein Deutsch ein altes Gedachtnis. English will assure that you actually hear what I mean. Happy New Year!
Alan
Oh, I'll be in Kaiserslautern in October for a reunion, maybe you can show my wife what the attraction of an XKE is all about.
thirsty.gif
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Alan Guttersen:
I'll be in Kaiserslautern in October for a reunion, maybe you can show my wife what the attraction of an XKE is all about.<hr></blockquote>

Alan;
Were you a K-Town "Military-Brat"??
I envy you, we were always sent across the "other" ocean.. Two years in Guam, two years in Japan, and the worst of it was three years in The Territory of Hawaii.. makes it really tough to come back to "the Mainland"
grin.gif
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by junior:
how disappointing, folks.
either do i have bad breath or foreigners are not welcome here, but i guess newbies should be at least acknowledged when they introduce themselfes after joining this list.
so, i'll move on.
junior
<hr></blockquote>

Junior;
As others have noted, this is a slow time of year.. family obligations and all..
Anyway, a belated "Welcome" from Texas. I'm one of a handful of folks on the BCF with an XK Jaguar.. A "real" Xk.. I have a '53 XK120DHC that I bought in '67 when I was a poor starving college student.. Now, I'm no longer a student.. the poor and starving part just seemed to stay..
I think you will find, if you post a question or a thought provoking query, you will get plenty of replies.. I guess most folks are just shy about saying "Howdy"..
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

Junior and all:

I just thought I'd be one of the apparent few on this list who owns a "trailer queen" E-Type (1966 RHD OTS Series 1; one of only 1182 ever made), and to defend (to a certain extent) why one keeps his classic in near perfect condition.

First, I am a long-time member of Jaguar Clubs of North America, and during the restoration of my E-Type, it has always been my contention to preserve the authenticity of the car whenever possible. Going hand in hand with preservation is cleanliness. Driving such a car on a daily basis in bad weather and on salty roads along with others on the road who are probably uninsured and who could care less about your classic Jaguar (and who are idiots to boot) just doesn't make sense to me. Why rack up the miles and wear the car out? Again, I'm addressing those who use their E-Type as their primary mode of transportation.

In contrast to what you may think, most "trailer queens" get driven on a regular basis on nice days. You only assume that they are museum pieces in folk's garages because they are (a) perfect and (b) arrive in trailers. Ask any curator of a classic car museum or any Pebble Beach car owner, and they will tell you that their car is driven on a regular basis...the trailer is just for protected transport. In order for me to compete (on a national level) in JCNA concours competitions, there is no way to transport or even drive a championship entry to the various competitions (some 1000 miles away) except in an enclosed trailer.

JCNA recognizes this difference by having the Champ division and the Driven division. There is no doubt that restoring an engine compartment (to champ condition) is an expensive proposition, and I don’t blame someone for not doing so. And I am never critical of a driven machine (except if it’s been poorly maintained). I contend that once someone has restored their engine compartment, he/she will tend to be much more careful with their car. In general, I find that those who are most critical about “trailer queens” (and not you in particular), usually have a classic that is either in pieces; one that doesn't run; or one that will be damned expensive to restore. Talking is one thing; doing is quite another.

Restoring my E-Type took about 20 years, either due to lack of money or lack of time (see the story of my car’s restoration at www.mcload.com). But I kept on believing that it would one day become quite a car to behold. I never got in a hurry (obviously!) and never compromised perfection for the sake of taking shortcuts to “just get it on the road”. And after all of that time and expense, I naturally wanted to show the car while it was in pristine condition. Now that I’ve won the 2002 JCNA National Championship in my class (all Series 1 E-Types), I’ve started driving the car on a more regular basis. I agree with all of you that the E-Type is a car designed to be driven and enjoyed. I just disagree that it’s a car to be driven hard and put up wet. It’s not a “throw-away” vehicle like the Taurus.

Respectfully,
Patrick McLoad
 
Re: bye bye ... was: introduction

Junior: Let me be clear that I'm perfectly OK with what you want to do with your car, and I express no "attitude" in my post...this is simply friendly banter. I understand your wanting to keep the character of your car intact. But just as you wouldn't let your house show its 30 years of wear, or your suit, or almost anything else you own, your E-Type is no different. It's crying out for some TLC! I can hear it...can't you?!

Respectfully,
Patrick
 
Back
Top