New California smog legislation for pre 76 cars

[Stewart]

Legislation (S.B. 1549) has been introduced in the California State Senate by Senator Dean Florez (senator.florez@sen.ca.gov) to repeal the state's current emissions test exemption for pre-1976 vehicles registered by new owners in the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. The District includes eight counties in California's Central Valley: San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare and the valley portion of Kern. Under the bill, after Jan. 1, 2009, new owners seeking to register a pre-1976 vehicle in these eight counties would be subject to emissions tests for the life of the vehicle. S.B. 1549 is scheduled to be considered by the California Senate Transportation and Housing Committee on April 1, 2008.

We Urge You to Call, E-Mail or Fax Senator Florez and Members of the Senate Transportation Committee (List Attached) Immediately to Oppose S.B. 1549

Existing law in California exempts all pre-1976 vehicles from emissions testing.

California's current emissions testing exemption recognizes the minimal impact of pre-1976 motor vehicles on emissions and air quality.

Pre-1976 vehicles constitute a small and shrinking portion of the overall vehicle population in California and are a poor source from which to look for further emissions reductions.

Pre-1976 antique and classic vehicles are overwhelmingly well-maintained.

Repeal of the exemption in the San Joaquin Valley could lead the Legislature to target other areas in the state in the future.

Legislators and regulators are again feeling the heat from a failed effort to meet air quality goals and are looking for a convenient scapegoat. The old car hobby should not carry the burden of their mistakes, as it has in previous amendments to the old car exemption!
Please phone, fax or e-mail Senator Florez to express your opposition to S.B. 1549. Senator Florez can be reached at:

E-Mail: Senator.Florez@sen.ca.gov
Phone: (916) 651-4016
Fax: (916) 327-5989

Please phone, fax or e-mail members of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee to express your opposition to S.B. 1549

California Senate Transportation & Housing Committee

(Click here to email all Committee members)

Senator Alan Lowenthal - Chair
Phone: 916/651-4027
Fax: 916/327-9113
Email: Senator.Lowenthal@sen.ca.gov

Senator Tom McClintock
Phone: 916/651-4019
Fax: 916/324-7544
Email: senator.mcclintock@sen.ca.gov

Senator Roy Ashburn
Phone: 916/651-4018
Fax: 916/322-3304
Email: senator.ashburn@sen.ca.gov

Senator Gilbert Cedillo
Phone: 916/651-4022
Fax: 916/327-8817
Email: senator.cedillo@sen.ca.gov

Senator Ellen Corbett
Phone: 916/651-4010
Fax: 916/327-2433
Email: senator.corbett@sen.ca.gov

Senator Bob Dutton
Phone: 916/651-4031
Fax: 916/327-2272
Email: senator.dutton@sen.ca.gov

Senator Tom Harman
Phone: 916/651-4035
Fax: 916/445-9263
Email: senator.harman@sen.ca.gov

Senator Christine Kehoe
Phone: 916/651-4039
Fax: 916/327-2188
Email: senator.kehoe@sen.ca.gov

Senator Jenny Oropeza
Phone: 916/651-4028
Fax: 916/323-6056
Email: senator.oropeza@sen.ca.gov

Senator Joe Simitian
Phone: 916/651-4011
Fax: 916/323-4529
Email: senator.simitian@sen.ca.gov

Senator Tom Torlakson
Phone: 916/651-4007
Fax: 916/445-2527
Email: senator.torlakson@sen.ca.gov

Senator Leland Yee
Phone: 916/651-4008
Fax: 916/327-2186
Email: senator.yee@sen.ca.gov

Please e-mail a copy of your letters to Steve McDonald at stevem@sema.org

 

[DrEntropy]

Re: New California smog legislation for pre 76 car

WHAT?!?!?

That's about as lame a "cause" as I've ever seen from a legislator... well, not really, but durn'd close!

Who ~IS~ this pinhead?!?

Without getting *too* political, I must declare that to be about as pathetic a bid for being seen to "attack" a woefully misunderstood issue as I've ever heard of. And I suspect this mook has himself ferried about in some luxo-mobile to get from home to office every day... at an abhorrent cost to the citizenry.

Someone "out there" needs to amass some empirical data on numbers of pre-'76 autos, miles driven annually, the amount of revenue in <span style="font-style: italic">collected taxes</span> the "specialty car" enthusiasts contribute to the state's coffers, movie/TV production revenues due to the hobby, the LOT. Then start a blanket letter-writing campaign to ALL the rest of the list, forwarding the data EACH AND EVERY time.

He's trying to find a helpless minority to point to and yell: "Pariah!"

And WRITE letters to Rep's. E-mails are worthless here.

 

[NutmegCT]

Re: New California smog legislation for pre 76 car

One tack that's often used to fight these things is to state the dollar amount that the car owner would need to spend to get the car "meet the standards". In the case of our LBC's, that would likely be several thousand per car. And as many of them are used as daily drivers, if they couldn't be legally driven, another vehicle would have to be purchased.

At least here in CT, the cost to the individual is often the primary selling point for getting the judiciary committee to cut the ignition on a legislator's "oh so important" crusade.

T.

 

[DrEntropy]

Re: New California smog legislation for pre 76 car

In Kalifornia it's the good of the collective wot's the over-riding consideration. The individual will be thrown under th' bus.

 

[Mickey Richaud]

Re: New California smog legislation for pre 76 car

In Kalifornia it's the good of the collective wot's the over-riding consideration. The individual will be thrown under th' bus.

Only if'n it's electric!

 

[DrEntropy]

Re: New California smog legislation for pre 76 car

*SNORK*

..."ding-ding"...

*THWUP!*


Rice-a-Roni...