I'm the numbskull. The 'ashtray delete' was an (obviously lame) attempt at humor; I know all 100s came with an ashtray, and I checked Anderson-Moment before posting (AFAIK, all Big Healeys came with ashtrays, and the 6-cyl cars had a cigar lighter option).
This was my first time commenting on BaT, and maybe the last, but I saw something fishy with this car--the inauthentic distributor and carbs--and thought I'd throw my two cents in (frankly, I'm surprised the Registry certified the car without them). The salient point that's come out in the commentary is that this car is misrepresented; apparently unintentionally as the would-be seller seems pretty distraught--he possibly got defrauded as well--and he's trying to resolve the issue with BaT. It now seems evident this car is a BN2 body with a BN1 frame and at least some of a BN2 drivetrain bolted-on. It should, at the least be re-listed with the new information and it will lose a lot of potential value, though it should still make for a nice driver. There have been numerous 'counterfeit' 100Ms where sellers have bolted-on an aftermarket bonnet and the larger carbs, and the Registry has identified them for owners, but this is the first time I've seen a 'bitsa' car advertised. Surprisingly, one commenter seems to be making the case that because all the M parts are there this is an M, even though it has an incorrect chassis/frame and, with the Registry criteria being what it is he has a point (is it a 1955.5 Austin-Healey 100Maybe?).