• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

Mystery engine identified

Share this page

waltesefalcon

waltesefalcon

Yoda
Platinum
Country flag
Offline
Well some of you will remeber that about a year ago I bought a MkII Spitfire, and right off it was easy to tell that the engine was incorrect since it had a single Stromberg set up instead of the SU set up. Well I got done with some things early and went out to piddle with it, and scraped off the block number. Its an FK engine making it a 1296, horray!, and from a US model MkIV. I thought I'd share with everyone.
 
My thoughts exactley, I was a bit worried that it would turn out to be a 1500. I think I'll stick with the engine I've got instead of looking for a 1147.
 
I'd like to know a little more about the differences in the various Spit motors if it's not to much trouble. What were the differences beyond just displacement?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to know a little more about the differences in the various Spit motors if it's not to much trouble. What were the differences beyond just displacement?

[/ QUOTE ]In short, the original Spitfire engine was 1147cc, derived from the then-current Herald engine (which, in turn, was derived from the 803cc and then 948cc Standard 8 / 10 engine). Bore / stroke was 69.3mm / 76 mm as I recall. These are notable for having the "six port" heads, with siamesed intake ports.

Spitfire Mk3s came with a 1296cc, eight-port head engine. Bore was increased on these to 74mm; stroke remained the same. The MkIV Spitfire used much the same engine, but with different ("commonised" with TR6/GT6) big end bearings.

Finally, the Spitfire "1500" is actually 1493cc, with the same 74mm bore and an increase in stroke to 87.5 mm (if I recall correctly). Nice for increased low-end torque, but the longer stroke might have something to do with the seemingly increased failure of big-end bearings that seems to curse these motors to this day.
 
Back
Top