• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.
    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

MGA MGA opinions?

Share this page

NutmegCT

NutmegCT

Great Pumpkin
Bronze
Offline
Looks like some bodywork was done to the starboard side, can't tell from the pix. Also would that engine seem to be an MGB one? I'd want to see it up close and underneath before I'd commit to that kind of money for it. Just my tuppence worth.
 
The photo is wrong, but the site won't let me delete it and replace it with the correct one for whatever reason.?? :soapbox: Moving on.
 
Paul - just hit Edit on the post, then scroll down to Manage Attachments.

That's where you can delete the photo.

TomM.
 
Easier to post the correct one! Not sure if there is an external difference between the 1500 and 1600 engines, but here is the factory engine. PJ
The MGB 1800 is different to some degree externally.

View attachment 47404
 
NutmegCT said:
Thanks Paul. Other than displacement, what are the differences in the engines?

TM
Click to expand...

Tom, Naturally the displacement between the 1500 & 1600 are different, but I don't know if there are any distinctive external differences where one can be identified from the other, block numbers would surly tell. Of course a matching number car would have the original factory engine. I might be a little prejudice as the A coupe is my favorite of the bunch! PJ
 
I think for my purposes (30-50 mph tooling around our curving New England blacktop roads), any functioning engine would be fine with me.

A colorful description of the Twin Cam, from a Time magazine article awhile back:

"It was a leaking, piston-burning, plug-fouling nightmare of a motor that required absolute devotion to things like ignition timing, fuel octane and rpm limits, less the whole shebang vomit connecting rods and oil all over the road. Many years after the engine was taken out of service, it was discovered that the problem lay in the carburetors. At certain rpm, resonant frequencies would cause the fuel mixture to froth, leaning out the fuel and burning the pistons. I've never had any such trouble with my iron-block, pushrod, lawn tractor engine. I'm just saying."

Just sayin'
 
OK, I'm going to stick my nose out a bit and say, from what I see in the car, the price seems to be a fair one, as long as there is no rust out where panels need replacing, maybe a little bargaining would be in order to your benefit. Of course I would want to hear it run and possibly drive it if possible to check out the drive train.
 
Yep - same here. I'm in no hurry, and just now learning some details of what to look for (and look out for) in MGAs.

Thanks.
TM
 
On second look, it seems it is a 1500/1600 MGA mill. Have to read the tag & casting I.D. on the block to tell. I was looking for the intake manifold firing order plate & studs, looks like it is obscured by the piece that holds the cable sheath. The carbs are right for the A as well.

I like the coupes too but without being able to give it a good eyeballing, it's anyone's guess as to what's under the bonnet or the paint.
 
And until I can find someone with an MGA coupe here in southern New England - I don't know if I'll even fit inside. Still no replies from local MG clubs.

5'10", 150 lbs. (and not as limber as I used to be ...)

One thing I remember about my TR3 - you needed to wear small shoes to fit your feet on those pedals!
 
My two cents worth. As I've posted here before, I had a 1959 Twin Cam for 6 months, bought new. Nice tight car, no rattles but a plug-fouling nightmare and heavy steering due to tc engine. Avoid at all costs. My brother had a regular '56 MGA, a better car in all respects. MGAs are tighter then TRs (at least they were when newer) but nowhere near as fast. Rack & pinion steering and wonderful handling. Small trunk due to styling which I consider the best looking MG of all time. I worked on several back in Boston in 1957, Easy to tune and work on, usual SUs, etc. Check today for rust. Coupes are very rare I would think. I don't think I ever saw one. If you get it, I'll drive up to see it when I come back from Florida.
 
In the irst photo the carbs are HS4's, in the second they APPEAR to be the correct H4's- in the first the exhaust manifold is MGB, in the second I can't see what it is.
I am also 5' 10" and 150 and I fit in my MGA just fine!
BillM
 
No Tom, mine is a roadster but my next door neighbor has an MGA coupe and it is the same, no problem.
BillM
 
Bill, thanks again.

Say, I didn't get any response when I asked this in an earlier thread here:

What's the width of the MGA with the two doors fully open? (I'm thinking of storage area I'll need for the car.)

Thanks.
Tom M.
Let the adventure begin!
 
Billm said:
No Tom, mine is a roadster but my next door neighbor has an MGA coupe and it is the same, no problem.
BillM
Click to expand...

Your neighbor has an MG? So does he complain about those "Danged Convertible Owner's"
next door?
 
He has 3 MGA roadsters and one coupe, his son in law has a convertajag and his wife has a convertabeetle-
he doesn't complain about my junk! :smile:
Bill
 
Back
Top