• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

Looking for a TR

Jim_Webby

Freshman Member
Offline
Hello,

I am a newbie to the BCF group and would like to ask for assistance from the other members in purchasing a new, to me anyway, TR sports car.

I have just started looking for a TR, having sold my Porsche 356 speedster replica, and at present know that I want to buy either a TR4 or TR250.

I previously owned a Herald 1200 back when I was in college, but that was about 10 years ago and also was back in the UK not in the US.

Can anyone give any pointers as to what to watch out for when I start looking at prospective vehicles?

Also, what should I expect to pay for a runner that is in generally good condition, but does not need to be concours quality?

Thank you for any help or advice.
 
Sorry, one more question;

Can anyone suggest any websites, publications, etc. where I might look for a suitable vehicle?

I am already looking at the classifieds here and at the VTR, as well as ebay, Classic Car Trader Online and Hemmings.

Thanks.
 
Sounds like you're looking in the right places. I just bought my TR4 through the VTR classifieds, and had good luck. I'd recommend picking up a copy of "Original TR4" by Bill Piggott -- it's a good general overview of the TR4 and has some good advice for what to look for. Most parts are available still, including repair panels.

Basic advice I got was less rust is good. Of course, I still bought one that needs floors, but who am I to say. The engines are very robust. Body on frame means most things on the body can be fixed -- if the frame is true.

As for prices, I watched eBay and the classifieds to get a feel. Also got a copy of one of the price guides (Collector Car Market Review) to get a feel. Seems to be anywhere from $2500 for a full on project to $15000 for a fully restored beauty.

I liked the TR4 since it's pretty basic, and with the minimal skill I have felt that I could work on it easily. TR4s are not that rare, so take your time and you'll find a great one.

You've found this group, and that's probably your best resource. These folks sure helped me a lot. Search through this forum and you'll find all sorts of good thoughts and advice.

-Drew
 
Hi Jim,

And, welcome!

I'll take a stab at some of your questions.

It sounds like you are set on one of the Michelotti-bodied cars (TR4/4A/5/250). Great! I'm 100% behind you, but I'm also quite biased after 25+ years TR4 ownership.

Googling on the Internet can help you find a lot of individual seller websites.

Although it largely looks the same, the TR4 (1961-65) is a somewhat different car from the later ones. It uses a ladder-type frame more similar to TR2/3, that is actually stiffer and more durable than the later cars' frames. It also rides a bit more harshly. And, some parts for TR4 can be a little harder to find (example, the late TR4/4A/5/250/6 steering rack is more easily found).

The TR4 uses the same basic 4-cylinder engine that was used from 1954 to 1967, TR2 through TR4A. The late TR4A version engine fitted with SU carbs is likely the most tweaked and best performing, in stock form. Slight improvments in cylinder head, manifolds, etc. added up to a little more power.

The chassis for the TR4A is a big change. It was designed to accomodate independent rear suspension, although an estimated 25% of TR4A were still fitted with live rear axle, instead. TR4A rear suspension is more difficult to tune, needs more care and maintenance, but is more comfortable riding and, done right, can give a little bit improved road-holding capability.

Earlier TR4 did not have wood dashes, but it was optional. TR4A all have wood. Overall, TR4 interior trim is a little less refined.

For safety reasons, there are some modifications that should be done on TR4A front suspension, as a matter of course. (Not needed on TR4, I am not sure if needed on 250). If driven hard, the rear hubs on the IRS models should be upgraded, possibly the axles/u-joints as well.

The TR250 is largely a TR4A with a 6-cylinder engine dropped in. There are a few other refinements. But, the engine is the main difference.

In England and Europe, a fuel injected version of the TR250, known as the TR5 was sold. This was not exported to the U.S., so they are rare here. It put out considerably more horsepower than the carb version in the U.S., roughly 145 compared to 105 bhp. The early Lucas P.I. (Petrol Injection) system is a little fussy and can be hard to find parts for.

The 6-cylinder engine is basically a very good one. The earlier 4-cylinder is probably a bit more durable. The interchangeable cylinder liners make the 4-cylinder easier to rebuild and modify, in many respects. There are a more used and new parts around for the 6-cylinder, since it continued to be used through TR6 production.

Each model has a slightly different soft top. The TR4 top can be removed to stow in the trunk, while the bare hoodsticks fold to be hidden under trim flaps in the cockpit. The TR4A and later use a less removeable top, more intended to be folded in the "rear seat" area and covered with a separate trim piece that snaps into place.

The key thing to watch for is rust. TRs tend to rust from the inside out. Common problem areas on the body are the inside top of the fenders, the rockers, the lower edge of the doors and the trunk lid. On the inner body, the sills, A-post and B-post bases are vulnerable. The driver's floor is often rust damaged in storage, by leaking brake/clutch master cylinders.

The frame has to be watched at the diagonal brace from the shock tower, at its base where it's welded to the main frame rail, because no drain hole was ever provided. Also look for ripples in the side of the main rails, that might indicate accident damage. Watch out for any TR without the crosstube support, from spring tower to spring tower in the engine compartment.

While I warn about rust, I don't really think that TRs are any more prone to it than many cars. The original Austin Mini and many other cars, American and imports, were probably worse. And, all the TR-series are body on frame construction, in many respects more easily repaired than uni-body cars like MGB. The TR4A and later frame is more prone to serious rust damage than the TR4 and earlier frame.

Driving these cars, all the usual engine checks apply. Watch for overheating. All the gearboxes should have synchromesh on all 4 forward gears. (If not, either the gearbox is worn or an earlier TR3 gearbox without 1st gear synchro is installed.) All models you are considering have rack & pinion steering that should be tight and precise.

If fitted, overdrive on TR4/4A/250/5 should work on 2nd, 3rd & 4th gears. 2nd gear OD should be used with some care, particularly with the earlier, harder shifting overdrives. It's easy to disable 2nd gear OD, while leaving it operational on 3rd & 4th, if wished.

You can find a lot of additional info about these cars all over the Internet. Still, I strongly recommend Bill Piggott's series of books on originality, along with Roger William's "Restoring Triumph..." series. If you want to do some performance tuning, Williams also has written a "How to Improve..." series.

The most generally desirable options on all these cars seem to be the original two piece hard top, A-type Overdrive, wire wheels (originally usually painted, but most fit chromed now) or Minilite alloys, wood-rimmed steering wheels and leather interior.

I don't follow costs closely. But, WAG/ballpark I'd say TR4/4A can be found for as little as a few hundred for a pitiful parts car to over $20,000 if in near concours condition. A daily driver in pretty good condition might sell for around $10,000-$15,000. A car that's largely complete but needs a lot of work, maybe is partially disassembled, an abandoned restoration project, might sell for $5000 or less.

TR250 are rarer cars and might sell for a bit more.

I'd expect a TR5 in the U.S. to bring the most of all.

An original hard top probably adds $1500-$2500 value; an overdrive is likely worth $1500-2500; wire wheels or alloys might add $500-$1000.

Oh, and one more thing. When originally sold, many of these cars were registered in the year sold, rather than the year built. So, for example, my car was registered in 1964 the year it was sold and licensed, although it was actually built in late 1962. The car's VIN/chassis and engine numbers can be important locating correct parts.

Have fun shopping! I'm sure you will get much more good advice from the folks here.

p.s. Back around 1977, when I bought my TR4, I was shopping for a sports car. I'd looked at several:
- two XK150s for $5000, some assembly required. Okay, actually a lot of assembly required!
- '63 XKE, in storage since 1964/65, but 1500 miles away. $2500
- '63ish 356, motor freshly rebuilt by a local Porsche tuning expert. It hit 120 mph with little effort! Needed paint (faded pale yellow) but the red leather interior was nice, if a bit flashy. $2500.
- My TR4, bright orange, but local and running well. $1800.
The poor, starving student in me won out. In those days, $700 was a lot of money! But I wish I could have bought them all!

Cheers!

Alan Myers
San Jose, Calif.
'62 TR4 CT17602L
 
Great summary by Alan, I would just add that you might (if you have not already) join your local Triumph club. Some of the best cars change hands by word of mouth among club members, in any case they will often be willing to help you evaluate a possible purchase and you even get a ride or drive in a couple of good examples in the meantime.

A quick Google brought up this link:

https://www.detroittriumph.org/

Good luck!
 
WOW!

Only a couple of hours since I first posted and already a wealth of information.

Alan, thank you so much for the reply - it certainly has got me thinking about what I should be looking for.

I have always thought that the Michelotti Triumphs were brilliant in their design - hence the reason I bought a Herald (which was my first car ever) back when I was a starving student.

Geo, thanks for the link, I will contact the club forthwith. I had already planned on going the the Fall event "Battle of the Brits" which is mentioned on the website with some friends who own MGAs.

I have a couple of questions;

- The cross tube support that Alan mentioned - does anyone have a photo of what this would look like? I have seen many photos of TR engine bays in the last few weeks, but don't recall seeing anything that was joining the two strut towers together. Is this likely because I didn't know what I was looking at, but want to make sure.
- I have seen photos of TR250s both with and without the triple stripes across the front of the bonnet and front wings. Is this because they were sold both with and without the stripes? Or is absence of the stripes indication of a respray? Such as during repairs after an accident. Should not having stripes cause me to look closer at other aspects of the car?

Once again, cheers ever so much for all the help and advice so far.

Jim.
 
The cross tube runs between the spring towers just in front of the motor. Its positioned just below the extention on the crank pully for the fan between the fan and the motor. If it's missing it's a likley sign of frame damage. (sorry no pic)
I would add that on the 4A thru 6's watch for rot in the frame right in front of the rear tires where either the leaf spring (TR4A solid axles) or the swing arms (all others) mount. Right where the frame turns back in twards the center of the car. This is where they rot first most of the time.
Good luck in your hunt.
My only advice is to spend the extra for the truly "rust free" model. I'm dealing with a pair of rotten hulks right now....... never again!
 
[ QUOTE ]
I had already planned on going ... with some friends who own MGAs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just think, soon you'll be able to blow their doors off in your Triumph. (It's really not fair!)

Regarding the cross tube, it's pretty obvious upon inspection and just something to watch out that it's not missing. Sometimes people remove the cross tube for whatever reason - an engine rebuild, to make fan belt replacement easier, etc. - then just leave it off. That's not good. The cross tube serves an important strengthening and stiffening function. There were several different versions of the cross tube, depending upon the age/model of the car they might have two bolts per end, three bolts per end, different bends and different brackets attached.

Moss Motor's online catalog illustration shows it in place on TR2/3, TR4 and TR4A frames (#50, #60 and #75, respectively). Notice they list it as N/A new. It can be difficult to locate a correct used replacement, plus serious tweaking might have been done to the frame by driving the car without one in place.

While looking at that same illustration, notice #77 on the TR4A frame. There are four of these brackets, two on each side, that are a safety concern, that I mentioned in my first response. They really need to be reinforced by welding in heavy gussets and adding mounting bolts. #63 is the much stronger version of this inner mounting point on TR4, but is not adjustable.

You can also see the angular brace behind each spring tower that was previously mentioned, leading down to the main frame rail.

I should also add, in the same area, on later TR4 and all 4A/250/5, there are two platforms for the steering rack just below the cross tube and just inboard of the spring towers. It's not uncommon for those platform/brackets welds to crack near the base where they attach to the frame.

Earlier TR4 had two "ears" that mount the rack & pinion steering, not entirely without concern either. There is a photo of one here in the "Miscellaneous Details" photo folder. This is actually an earlier frame where these "ears" didn't have an important gusset securing them to the lower control arm bracket. This frame's "ears" were cracking loose and had to be rewelded, because of stresses put on them without that gusset in there. Photo shows the gusset being welded in, but unfortunately doesn't show the cross tube, which runs across the car just above the two brackets, parallel with the steering rack tube.

I don't want to scare you about the strength of the frame on these cars. It's really pretty good, I've seen many very good ones, especially the TR2/34 frame. It just needs close inspection in a few places where it's subject to more stresses due to engine weight, steering, etc., or prone to corrosion.

Oh, and I think the racing stripe was optional on TR250. That was the only model to be striped that way.

Cheers!

Alan Myers
San Jose, Calif.
'62 TR4 CT17602L
 
The hood Racing stripe was standard on all TR250s sold in the US. If it is missing, it is a sure sign of a respray, and probably buried under layers of paint.

This is one of the ways you can tell if its a "bitsa" 250. (TR6 engine in a 4A). Remove the turn signal/side marker light on the front fender, and ta remnant of the stripe should be visible.

Check out the buyers guides to TR250 and TR4 at vtr.org. These are the best online guides on where and what to look for.
 
Read...Read...Read...everything you can about what to look for when purchasing that 'new' car. There are several good articles on the net concerning "what to look for" or "look-out for" . Although each of the cars have different specific problem areas, rust is the common killer especially if found in the frame. Unless you purchase a freshly restored car, I can almost guaranty you will find some rust somewhere - just look for the one with the least is the trick - surface rust can be easily dealt with but rust through for instance in floor pans or sills is a little more ardious, and frame rust through/thinning is serious.

BE PATIENT....do not be too anxious to spend that hard earned cash.

One other avenue for searching for a car on the 'net' is www.british carlinks.com. This site has a listing of British car clubs which generally include a classified section. I have found that these listings are more fairly represented and priced. This is where I found my TR6 and Spitfire.

Good Luck
 
OK sorry about that,actually the 2nd best TR4 I ever owned is.......my 61 TR3. heh heh heh.... I had a solid axle TR4a that was terrific and truly regret selling it.But the obscene money he offered eased the pain somewhat.
 
I have a TR3 & a TR4 and they are about 97% the same car.

But then, Humans and Chimpanzees have 97% the same DNA.

3% can be a big difference.
 
Geo, you're pretty much correct.But just for the heck of it,on some lazy Sat afternoon....have your wife put on an auburn wig!
 
Thanks again for the replies and advice.

I just got back from looking at one vehicle that seems v.promising. I checked all the problem areas listed above - frame is solid or appears to stand up well to bashing with a hammer! And the frame cross member between the front struts was in place and appeared solid.

One did I find sitting in this car today, was that it was rather cramped - more so than I recall in other TR4s or TR5s I have sat in. One reason for this is that there was a roll bar fitted which prevented the seats from travelling back the full distance, I have arranged with the bloke who is selling to go back tomorrow and try the car w/o the rollbar fitted.

However, I did have a couple of questions for anyone to answer;

Firstly, is it possible to adjust the position of the steering wheel forwards or backwards? This was one adjustment I made in my Herald that certainly helped in making the car much more comfortable (I am 6'5" tall). If this adjustment is not possible, then next choice would be to go to a smaller steering wheel - already plan on fitting a wooden wheel so this is not a big problem.

Secondly, how easy is it to change the rear oil seal on a transmission? There was a small leak which isn't a problem in itself, however the oil drops onto the exhaust and the burning smell is rather unpleasant.

Lastly, when driving the vehicle today I and the owner both heard a distinctive clunk coming from the rear end when the clutch was engaged. Apparently, and the owner had documents to prove this, the Hardy-Spicer joints (eight of them) were replaced in the last couple of years and have not had any great mileage on them since. The current owner has had the car for two years and said that he has probably only put a couple of hundred on it during that time - this would seem to be borne out by the cobwebs under the car! However, if it is not the UJ's and not the differential mounts (which were changed at the same time) what else could it be? what else is there that could move when the vehicle is under power? I must admit that the sounds was very like the noise my Herald used to make when the UJ's on that "went for a burton".

The car is now on jack stands in the bloke's garage so tomorrow I will try the seat again w/o rollbar and also see if I can locate the source of the clunking.

Other than the above the car was v. good. It had been resprayed - hence no stripes - and had a few chips. But since a restoration is planned in the future this is not a problem. The acceleration was good (dual Strombergs) and I can certainly see myself pissing off the MGA owners!

I'll post anything else i find out tomorrow.


Cheers,

Jim.

PS I am glad to see that there exists a healthy dose of sarcasm on the forum. One of the things I miss most about Blighty is the ability of the inhabitants to take the mickey out of each other and themselves.

javascript:void(0)/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cheers.gif
 
I couldn't tell whether this was a TR4A or TR250 but perhaps they are the same in that there is small adjustment available to the steering wheel by loosening the jam-nut and allen-head screw on the steering column connector, under the bonnet near the firewall. But you may find it is already as far forward as possible.

Note: I think it is actually the steering column impact-absorbtion device... also, if you use a tonneau you pretty much have to put the steering wheel in one particular spot to get the wheel pocket over the wheel. Of course that spot is not 'full forward'.

I wouldn't have thought a rear seal drip would hit the exhaust but then I do not have the IRS arrangement. Too bad as most find a small leak there acceptable when they examine the alternative.

On jackstands you should be able to lie on your back and shake, pull and twist until you find the slack, Yes, I would have thought U-joints or a broken mount too. I would think a loose trailing arm would also clunk under power.

P.S. I had to Google 'went for a Burton'... somehow I got this far in life w/o encountering that colorful reference.
 
As to the seat position and space in the car, I am 175cm and find that I have to have the TR4A seat at the second from the front spot on the track, so there is lots of room to move back (I had to add two more holes in the track to let the seat go forward enough so my wife could drive it). You may find it better once the roll bar is gone.

As for the rear oil seal in the transmission the Standard Motor Company Inc. manual called "schedule of repair times" (this is for the TR3 but the gear box is the same) claims that job will take a mechanic 2 hours 15 minutes. It states "to renew rear oil seal leaving gearbox in chassis (includes operation S. G.6- rmove and refit floor boards). With or without overdrive fitted." I assume by floor boards it meand the "hump" over the transmission.

BTW I got this little publication reprint years ago from TRF and I recomend it highly. It has been right on the money loads of times for me and I always refer to it before starting a "big" job. It helps me decide if I want to tackle the job "today or when I have more time on my hands".
 
I forgot one thing. The "klunk" One thing I found that made that sound was a bad wire wheel. I had the sound and was checking the U-joints and diff etc. And after all that it turned out my rear right wheel had 60 loose spokes. That wheel is no longer in use!
 
Adrio,

Thanks for the heads up about the wire wheel - this car does have them and they are in poor condition visually.

I will check this out tomorrow as well.

Cheers,

Jim.
 
Alan, wow, that was quite a summary. Like you, I bought my first TR4 years ago. I was looking at the pictures--if I was looking at the right ones, you actually pulled the entire body off the frame, and had the frame and engine, still intact, in your front driveway?

How hard is it to remove body parts, and what kind of trouble did you have re-installing and replacing them over the years. It seems like a task for only the highly experienced among us. I noticed that some shops in Britain still manufacture body components.

It is a simple car. I'd be partial to TR4s and TR4As, and since friends over the years had "3s" I could go that way, too.

I'd like to see more and more of these cars restored so that the manufacturers keep making parts.

By the way, a good dash man for TRs is right there in San Jose. Randy Keller. I installed a new one from him about 4 months ago.
 
Back
Top