• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)

Kunifer vs Steel Brake Piping

Share this page

M

musme

Senior Member
Offline
Any opinions on using Kunifer vs Steel Pipes on my 100-4 restoration ??
please tell your experience.
Thanks in Advance
Jose
 
Hello,

I bought Kunifer brake pipes for my restoration. But I will stay with steel pipes because there are original. The copper looks in my opinion a little bit like poorly restored..This is my opinion.

Bye-michel who finished the last weeks the living rooom refurbishment . No time for Healeys..
 
I'm not sure if they were Kunifer, but back in theearly 90s, I put "copper-alloy" brake pipes (sourced from either AH Spares, or SC Carburettors) on my car and regretted it. They were very soft (which did made them easy to bend) and easily damaged.

A few years ago, I replaced them with a full set (I mean EVERY pipe) from Classic Tube https://www.classictube.com/

While I opted for stainless steel, they also do mild steel as originally equipped, if you're going full concours.

They come pre-bent, and fit very well with only minor tweeking. The longest tube (4-way to rear brakes) was bent in half with a large-large radius and was easily straightened.

I was able to install them in a fully assembled car with a minimum of fuss.

Some details: https://www.rfdm.com/gallery/album51
 
Back
Top