• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Kunifer vs Steel Brake Piping

musme

Senior Member
Offline
Any opinions on using Kunifer vs Steel Pipes on my 100-4 restoration ??
please tell your experience.
Thanks in Advance
Jose
 
Hello,

I bought Kunifer brake pipes for my restoration. But I will stay with steel pipes because there are original. The copper looks in my opinion a little bit like poorly restored..This is my opinion.

Bye-michel who finished the last weeks the living rooom refurbishment . No time for Healeys..
 
I'm not sure if they were Kunifer, but back in theearly 90s, I put "copper-alloy" brake pipes (sourced from either AH Spares, or SC Carburettors) on my car and regretted it. They were very soft (which did made them easy to bend) and easily damaged.

A few years ago, I replaced them with a full set (I mean EVERY pipe) from Classic Tube https://www.classictube.com/

While I opted for stainless steel, they also do mild steel as originally equipped, if you're going full concours.

They come pre-bent, and fit very well with only minor tweeking. The longest tube (4-way to rear brakes) was bent in half with a large-large radius and was easily straightened.

I was able to install them in a fully assembled car with a minimum of fuss.

Some details: https://www.rfdm.com/gallery/album51
 
Back
Top