Is a poor restoration worse than no restoration

[TomMull]

For example:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Lotus...ash=item283c76e32a:g:UioAAOSwDtpZbOI~&vxp=mtr
Condition 4 price so far although reserve not met. The poor paint is probably an indication of other faults, e.g. headlights seem to be stuck open, boot fit seems poor. Probably a mechanical craps shoot also. I think I've just answered the question although I do like the model. Anything positive?
Tom

 

[NutmegCT]

"Is a poor restoration worse than no restoration"

Yes! Starting from scratch is often easier, and better for the car, then trying to figure out and remove bodged patches and repairs.

Tom M.

 

[JPSmit]

Absolutely - not only do you have to go back and correct but, in my experience often there is damage or cheap cr*p substituted for original parts.

 

[dklawson]

I'll take the other position and say "it depends".

If you are looking for a correctly restored car and accidentally buy one full of compromises then a previous budget restoration can be very detrimental to your wallet. On the other hand, if you study the car prior to purchase and are looking for a driver, budget repairs and shortcuts may not be a problem for you. It really depends on your expectations for the car and what you plan to use it for.

 

[TomMull]

I guess I pretty much agree with Doug, although my question might have been better stated, "Does a poor restoration add any value to the car?" For me, the answer is pretty clear. I have a much greater tolerance for flaws from 50 or more years of wear and tear than I do from poor work.
Tom