Call me contrarian- of course, there are items there that are, thankfully, anachronistic...and the piece itself is of questionable provenance...
https://www.snopes.com/language/document/goodwife.asp...
but many items on that list have merit. I am not prepared to declare that the social mores of 2008 are so far superior to generations before on every issue. The idea that a spouse may be willing to do these things, or even be expected to do so is not about superiority or subjugation- it's about each spouse willingly serving the other.
Too many marriages are based on the misconception that a good marriage should be "50-50". Nonsense. That just results in each spouse not so much giving their 50%, but insisting on
getting their 50%. Marriage was designed to be 100-100 with each spouse giving their all for the other. It doesn't always happen- to be certain, but when the goal we work towards is to love our spouse self
lessly, it has a tendency to help past the situations when we become sel
fish.
This article (if it is indeed authentic) was written to women. It does not imply men have no responsibilities- it is not written to men. We may very well find "old fashioned" some of the notions about the responsibilities of a husband in generations before if we saw that article....
...but the purpose of a 50 year old article making the rounds on the internet is not historical accuracy, it is temporal, or rather, generational superiority. A typical reaction by some of the generation that followed the "Greatest Generation". Rather than thank their forebears for the sacifices they made to make life easier, they not only reject, but ridicule the very morality that provided the freedom to question that they think they first discovered some time after 1959.
Geez- I took this in a more serious direction than even I expected.