
Offline
I wonder if "our cars" are looking like pre-war cars do to me to the younger generation. I like all interesting cars, but pre-war stuff, doesn't move me like an old Jag or Austin Healey.
.
I think that's the general consensus of the "experts". Car buffs are interested in the cars of their youth.There's a lot of truth to that. When I was a kid in the 60s local shows would be 50-75% Model Ts and Model As, the cars that the then older middle age guys remembered from their youth and could now afford to own and restore and drive in parades. I have a cousin in his later 70s who has a couple 57 Chevys. Why, it was the car that he and his wife dated in. And my British cars come from what I saw on TV and movies and magazines when I was a kid and can now afford. Younger folks I know are more interested in hopped up Japanese coupes and sedans.
However, what explains the introduction of modern version muscle-cars e.g. Dodge or Ford, and those from Toyota e.g Supra and VW? These cars are marketed to those of a particular age group but younger folks go bonkers over these too. There's a long cue for the new Bronco. What's old becomes new again: Healeys are timeless me thinks...GONZO.I think that's the general consensus of the "experts". Car buffs are interested in the cars of their youth.
However, what explains the introduction of modern version muscle-cars e.g. Dodge or Ford, and those from Toyota e.g Supra and VW? These cars are marketed to those of a particular age group but younger folks go bonkers over these too. There's a long cue for the new Bronco. What's old becomes new again: Healeys are timeless me thinks...GONZO.
Hear that a lot. And I don't entirely disagree. But...I think that's the general consensus of the "experts". Car buffs are interested in the cars of their youth.
How many have been properly introduced to classics?.... Younger folks I know are more interested in hopped up Japanese coupes and sedans.
There's a lot of truth to that. When I was a kid in the 60s local shows would be 50-75% Model Ts and Model As, the cars that the then older middle age guys remembered from their youth and could now afford to own and restore and drive in parades. I have a cousin in his later 70s who has a couple 57 Chevys. Why, it was the car that he and his wife dated in. And my British cars come from what I saw on TV and movies and magazines when I was a kid and can now afford. Younger folks I know are more interested in hopped up Japanese coupes and sedans.
Rick and Bob, yeah, there are kind of two sides to this, while a Healey is closer in looks and performance to a modern Miata than a 1920s Stutz or whatever, and they can do ok in modern traffic and cruise down the highway at 75-80 mph--I frequent some car forums that cater more to modern cars and enthusiasts. Many comments about "underpowered" BRZs, FRSs, and RX8 with only 200 plus hp. Many references to other new cars with "only" 300 plus hp, slow cars that take 6-7 seconds to reach 60, some even call the new Miata, a high five second car, slow. Our Healeys, MGs, and Triumphs with 80-150 hp, no tech, or ABS or EFI, or airbags probably seem as creaky and old as a 40 hp Model A (I don't know how much hp, just throwing a ballpark number out) seems to many of us. Perception, largely formed by what you grew up with, frames your personal reality.
If only they knew. My Mustang GT has 480HP--when I can buy or blend 93-octane or better--and will do 0-60 in 4.6s (best I've managed is 5.4s), but for just cruising and enjoying the environment and the time passing the Healey can't be beat.
If only they knew. My Mustang GT has 480HP--when I can buy or blend 93-octane or better--and will do 0-60 in 4.6s (best I've managed is 5.4s), but for just cruising and enjoying the environment and the time passing the Healey can't be beat.