angelfj said:
and this is one of the main reasons for the development of the alternator.
Sorry, Frank, I disagree. Alternators work on the exact same electromagnetic principles as DC generators; except they use diodes instead of a commutator to rectify the generated AC. They still have brushes, and rings for the brushes to contact (though they are called slip rings instead of commutators because the connection is constant). And their output is still a function of engine rpm, field current, number of turns, etc.
The main reason they work better at idle is a combination of smaller pulley and larger armature; both allowed because the simpler structure of the armature allows it to withstand the higher forces caused by high rpm and large diameter. The stock TR6 alternator still puts out almost nothing at idle.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:]A rotating permanent magnet is used as the field[/QUOTE]Not a permanent magnet, but an electromagnet, just like the field of a DC generator. (At least for car alternators. Some low-output motorcycle and bicycle alternators do use permanent magnets.)
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:]Don't do that, unless you want to buy a new alternator.[/QUOTE]Here again, I disagree. It won't damage anything to wire the alternator directly to the starter solenoid, and in fact that IS the way Dan's kit is designed to be wired. Obviously (I hope !) the alternator is not turning fast enough to do anything while the engine is being cranked; but even if it was, it wouldn't damage it. But adding the jumper Dale proposed would prevent the ammeter from working properly, which kind of negates the point of hooking it up in the first place.
Dan's solution (as others have recommended) is to convert to a voltmeter. As I see it, there are pros and cons to either approach; it comes down to a matter of personal preference. I would (did) keep the original ammeter, but Dale can make his own decision. Either way will work adequately.