-
Hey Guest!
British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
Fuel Line Question
- Thread starter HarryL
- Start date
Share this page
HerronScott
Darth Vader
Offline
Harry,
My restoration was a long time ago but I did not replace the metal fuel line at the time. I never had any issues with the rubber lines leaking (which I did replace of course) and I thought it was 5/16". I'm not sure how that corresponds to the numbering system you mention).
Scott
My restoration was a long time ago but I did not replace the metal fuel line at the time. I never had any issues with the rubber lines leaking (which I did replace of course) and I thought it was 5/16". I'm not sure how that corresponds to the numbering system you mention).
Scott
Geo Hahn
Yoda
Offline
If you are indeed referring to those 2 short sections of fuel lines that connect the hard line -- no problems with leaking other than fuel lines do eventually get old.
You will want to use the best (I used fuel injection hose) as the rear one requires draining the tank which is inconvenient enough you won't want to do it again anytime soon.
You will want to use the best (I used fuel injection hose) as the rear one requires draining the tank which is inconvenient enough you won't want to do it again anytime soon.