• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)

Ford Explorer - I'm thinking of One

Share this page

AngliaGT

AngliaGT

Great Pumpkin
Silver
Offline
Any information?I've got a '94 Dodge Dakota that
needs a few things.As we're taking care of our 4-1/2-
year old Grandaughter,an Explorer might make more sense.
Yes,I do know the transmissions are a weak area (we had-
a '93 Aerostar before).

- Doug
 
I don't know anything about Fords these days. All I can tell you is I just put a new automatic transmission in my Dodge Durango @ 140,000 mi. All I will say is OUCH! {price wise}
I also have a 95 Dakota inline 4 cyl, it leaks oil into the radiator! How, I can't figure out. There is NO water in the oil {In the pan} {this truck has less than 60,000 miles on it}
Needless to say ..... NO more Dodges for me.
 
I'm on my second one. I love them. Never had a problem. I drive it all winter through ice and snow, over mountains and hills. Its my favorite expressway vehicle. Never had a transmission problem. 19-21 mpg depending on the season. Feels like a car on the inside. Between the two of them, i've owned an explorer for 9 years.
 
We had the Mercury equivalent (Mountaineer)and had very few problems with it.

We had no problems with the transmission or transfer cases (all-time 4WD).

I would recommend this vehicle.
 
Rick I agree ...have 2002 Mountaineer...but did have the 140K 3rd gear out problem....$2500 for the new trans, which was a good deal....an Explorer pulled in right behind me same thing...but still recommend
 
I have a '98 Explorer since 2000 and no transmission problems. I also have several friends with Explorers and none have ever complained of transmission problems. Before this I had a '87 Aerostar and its transmission was good for 70k miles as everyone claimed. At 70k I had it rebuilt and at 140k it went again. That's when I got the Explorer. I understand it is the same transmission but it has been upgraded and improved several times since the Aerostar original.
 
My brother in law had a 92 with 130K and no mechanical issues that he just got rid of (donated to a guy at a boat yard where it's still going strong) and bought a new one last fall. He loves them.
 
I had a '92 Explorer Sport, 5-Speed. Pretty decent vehicle. Never in the shop once except for an exhaust system.
 
I had an first year Explorer (marked a 91 although I got in July of 90) and it ran for about 15 years until the manual trans finally got the point it would only move with the clutch pedal depressed. I really liked it, but I no longer needed such a big car when I retired from working. I do not know anything about them with automatics though.
 
Brooklands said:
I had an first year Explorer (marked a 91 although I got in July of 90) <snip>
Click to expand...

Dave! They sure changed the body lines of the Explorer/Mountaineer over the years....looking at the picture you posted!

grin.gif
 
If someone knows of an HONEST deal on one - 4 doors,
automatic,cloth interior,please let me know.I'd like to
find a nice one,before I put more money into the Dakota.

- Doug
 
Sorry...I sold the 2002 Mountaineer about 6 months ago. Got $4000 for it; it had 130k on it. I bought it in 2004 with about 30k on it. The wife now has a 2006 GMC Envoy Denali.
 
Back
Top