Offline
With every man and his dog walking around with a cellphone camera in their hand, clicking away at anything that moves, are there any meaningful images anymore? If there are they more often than not getting buried in the clutter.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all in when it comes to digital imaging. Instant gratification and all that. But there are comparatively few photos deliberately composed and intentionally shot, compared to the volume of images we're inundated with on a daily basis. From the guy standing with cellphone in hand, showing another person "This is my family, this is my son, my car, last Christmas..." Flicking a finger across a three-inch screen, half-second intervals, to seeing Facebook and the rest, with images of the same. It just doesn't seem to have much import somehow. Seeing a dresser top with framed photos of folks past and present, a bookcase with framed images of family and friends, an album of pictures going back generations. Those things seem to be now replaced with that swipe of a finger and a glance. Galleries, for the most part supplanted by on-line photo aggregating businesses like Shutterfly, Shutterstock, Zenfolio, etc. Are there photos that have not been taken? Of course. But when producing a piece for publication or an ad, most commercial houses will go with: "We need a shot of people at a desk, looking interested in the paper one of them is holding in their hand. Search Shtterstock." And among the plethora of choices, they pick one. Too generic, not relevant to who's being billed, IMHO. I know it comes down to cost. The money to hire a pro to do a session with personnel from the business as opposed to that generic image. But it would have the relevant tie-in to the client's business.
And don't get me started about photojournalism...
Don't get me wrong, I'm all in when it comes to digital imaging. Instant gratification and all that. But there are comparatively few photos deliberately composed and intentionally shot, compared to the volume of images we're inundated with on a daily basis. From the guy standing with cellphone in hand, showing another person "This is my family, this is my son, my car, last Christmas..." Flicking a finger across a three-inch screen, half-second intervals, to seeing Facebook and the rest, with images of the same. It just doesn't seem to have much import somehow. Seeing a dresser top with framed photos of folks past and present, a bookcase with framed images of family and friends, an album of pictures going back generations. Those things seem to be now replaced with that swipe of a finger and a glance. Galleries, for the most part supplanted by on-line photo aggregating businesses like Shutterfly, Shutterstock, Zenfolio, etc. Are there photos that have not been taken? Of course. But when producing a piece for publication or an ad, most commercial houses will go with: "We need a shot of people at a desk, looking interested in the paper one of them is holding in their hand. Search Shtterstock." And among the plethora of choices, they pick one. Too generic, not relevant to who's being billed, IMHO. I know it comes down to cost. The money to hire a pro to do a session with personnel from the business as opposed to that generic image. But it would have the relevant tie-in to the client's business.
And don't get me started about photojournalism...