Hi
Gotta question. The clutch slave cylinder on my friends 1975 TR6 is mounted like this.
The push rod is in the top notch. Which I have read is a no no. Should be in center hole.
Current clutch feel is very positive, has a definite over center feel, does not drag.
Master cylinder is leaking.
The current installed slave cylinder is a Lockheed, made in England. It appears to be a little larger around than the replacement, and about the same length as the replacement.
The replacement is a Girling from Moss.
We were going to replace both and the plastic line.
Why the spacer bolts?
Should we continue to use them?
Just mount the replacement cylinder in place?
Or remove the spacer bolts and mount without the spacer bolts? Is this a 1975 improvement?
Would appear if we don't use the spacer bolts the push rod would have to be longer.
Thanks
Gotta question. The clutch slave cylinder on my friends 1975 TR6 is mounted like this.
The push rod is in the top notch. Which I have read is a no no. Should be in center hole.
Current clutch feel is very positive, has a definite over center feel, does not drag.
Master cylinder is leaking.
The current installed slave cylinder is a Lockheed, made in England. It appears to be a little larger around than the replacement, and about the same length as the replacement.
The replacement is a Girling from Moss.
We were going to replace both and the plastic line.
Why the spacer bolts?
Should we continue to use them?
Just mount the replacement cylinder in place?
Or remove the spacer bolts and mount without the spacer bolts? Is this a 1975 improvement?
Would appear if we don't use the spacer bolts the push rod would have to be longer.
Thanks
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 