Andrew Mace said:
at a price, of course. Add to that the labor of swapping the body over, etc., and it might be more cost-effective to correct and repair any damage on the original frame?
I think the real thing is to consider all the repairs that CANNOT be done at home. Checkbook restoration can be very expensive. And while I understand that there are some things that one would rather trust a professional with, the need to take in mind all the help they may need.
$1000 for the car
$1000 for frame repair
$1000 for paint
$1000 engine repair
$1000 for body repair
I'm just making up numbers, but if such things need professional restoration yours looking at a $5000 car here, maybe more since I didnt consider interior, rechroming, and other misc.
So I go back to what I said earlier, if youre going to do the work yourself, more power to you. If you plan on hiring someone else for the bulk of the work, youd be better off spending more for one thats previously been restored.
$1000 car + $1000 frame repair, may actually be a good deal, if thats all they plan on paying for. My car appeared to be in excellent shape. Apparently it had been restored in the early 90s, but parked outside with no weather stripping, it quickly turned to heck. Both floor boards, rocker panels, rear fenders, and rear valence all had rust damage. Some of which had been repaired simply by slapping bondo over it. One actually had metalwork, but tack welded, so the seam was only covered by bondo, and more rust formed around the repair.
So, IMO, on any GT6, such damaged panels seen in the pics would need to be replaced anyway, on any gt6 of that age. So, in a way, my GT6 was just as expensive, only because my frame didnt need repair.