GregW
Yoda

Offline
Yes, both are IR.
Oddly, for years I've always thought Bombay beach was named after the city in India. I have also known for a while that there was a military base on the Southern side of the sea. During WW2, the sea was used to test different aerodynamic shapes for the Hiroshima bomb. Bombers would aim at targets out in the water near the base to see which design was most accurate. So it finally clicked in my brain today that Bombay referred to the bombing runs.
Oddly, for years I've always thought Bombay beach was named after the city in India. I have also known for a while that there was a military base on the Southern side of the sea. During WW2, the sea was used to test different aerodynamic shapes for the Hiroshima bomb. Bombers would aim at targets out in the water near the base to see which design was most accurate. So it finally clicked in my brain today that Bombay referred to the bombing runs.

Offline
Interesting bit of history, too.Yes, both are IR.
Oddly, for years I've always thought Bombay beach was named after the city in India. I have also known for a while that there was a military base on the Southern side of the sea. During WW2, the sea was used to test different aerodynamic shapes for the Hiroshima bomb. Bombers would aim at targets out in the water near the base to see which design was most accurate. So it finally clicked in my brain today that Bombay referred to the bombing runs.
Were you there for work? Only production I could find of note was a French one in the time period.
GregW
Yoda

Offline
You keep sayin' that.One of these day I have got to get a camera converted to IR!
Offline
I know. One of these days just never seems to get hereYou keep sayin' that.


Offline
The shot of the gutted house is stunning! The way you composed that shot is impressive.
I also really like the crusty crane. It is a really interesting shot. The frame on it adds an element to it. Is that a lens hood that is being partially captured?
I also really like the crusty crane. It is a really interesting shot. The frame on it adds an element to it. Is that a lens hood that is being partially captured?
Offline
Must have been a heck of a party the nigh before!Bombay beach again. Remains of a nightclub I believe.

Offline
I expect the gutted building was a boathouse. As for the vignetting, my money's on a wide-angle lens not quite covering the IR sensor area at a wide aperture. Could be a software effect, but I'm inclined to say no to that.The shot of the gutted house is stunning! The way you composed that shot is impressive.
I also really like the crusty crane. It is a really interesting shot. The frame on it adds an element to it. Is that a lens hood that is being partially captured?
GregW
Yoda

Offline
That was the Cokin filter holder on a wide angle lens. I was using a polarizer and the filter holder projects forward quite a bit (it can hold up to 3 filters at once). After that shoot, I bought some standard screw-on type CP filters.What created the vignetting in the last two? Your D610 IR sensor would have been the same (I assume). Lens difference?
GregW
Yoda

Offline
Thanks. The house had a painted sign on it saying "Bait Shop" I don't know if the structure was created specifically for that though.The shot of the gutted house is stunning! The way you composed that shot is impressive.

Offline
Now it's just photography bait.Thanks. The house had a painted sign on it saying "Bait Shop" I don't know if the structure was created specifically for that though.
Offline
Iβve a couple dozen Cokin Filters from back when I was first starting in photography (film). I figured the more filters I had the better photographer Iβd be (that prediction turned out wrong). I need to break some of them out and play around with them.That was the Cokin filter holder on a wide angle lens. I was using a polarizer and the filter holder projects forward quite a bit (it can hold up to 3 filters at once). After that shoot, I bought some standard screw-on type CP filters.