[ QUOTE ]
There was another test that showed better braking with the Toyota calipers, just read it a week ago but can't remember what site it was on---
[/ QUOTE ]
This was on the VTR site, the link is:
https://www.vintagetriumphregister.org/maintain/brake-conversion.shtml
They found:
[ QUOTE ]
All tests were performed with a newly rebuilt master cylinder, using DOT 5 brake fluid. The variations tested and the results of the testing were:
1. Early (prior to metric calipers, Girling 16PB) stock configuration with semi metallic pads, composite shoes and 0.70" rear wheel cylinders: 262 feet with a standard deviation of 19; 6 data points, tossed out both the minimum and maximum measurements.
2. Toyota front calipers with semi metallic pads, composite shoes: 243 feet with a standard deviation of 9; 8 data points, tossed out minimum and maximum.
3. Toyota front calipers with semi metallic pads, composite shoes with a 7/8 inch rear wheel cylinder: 215 feet with a standard deviation of 9; 9 data points, tossed out minimum and maximum.
As you can see, there was a significant performance advantage to the four piston caliper conversion. Since the pad surface area is much larger, this performance differential should increase if the brakes are used a lot and begin to heat up.
[/ QUOTE ]
Using the Toyota calipers alone there was, in general terms, a roughly 10% reduction in stopping distance (262->243) and more consistent braking performance (standard deviation halved: 19->9).
A two sample t test could be run to determine whether there was a statistically signioficant difference in the braking performance of the two set ups:
t = 262-243 / (((19^2)/8)+((9^2)/6)))^.5
t = 19 / 8.38 = 2.27
Looking at the appropriate statistical tables yields an estimate that there's a 97.5% likelihood that average braking distances are improved over stock.
Of course this combined with the rear cylinders makes braking all that much better....