Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
When we toured Clyde Butcher's place, we saw various versions of his photos and his son-in-law who does his darkroom work, showed us the simple dodging and burning tools and various prints resulting therefrom, including some prints rejected by the master. Many of the visitors were totally unaware of the entire film process.
-
Hey Guest!
British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Back to Film
- Thread starter Gliderman8
- Start date
Share this page
Offline
No argument with regard to fine art photography or studio work. Photo manipulation has its place, agreed. Done plenty of it myself on images made in a studio or for artistic effect. My issue with digital imaging is strictly from a photojournalistic point of view. The temptation has likely been there to manipulate the image both at the scene (look at Matthew Brady's history!) and in the darkroom, but the advent of digital imaging has made it much, much easier to do so.
To quote a pal: "Is it talent and timing, or just a truckload of kick-ass software?!?"
To quote a pal: "Is it talent and timing, or just a truckload of kick-ass software?!?"