Hello Alan,
if the question had been that I want to fit 2" S.U.'s then I would have said no, that 1.75" or 1.5" would be the choice but the engine alreadty has 2" which I believe will work if set up correctly and any faults remedied. (Incidentally, I do not consider leaking throttle shafts a big problem as it is at idle and low speed that they affect running. Drive with a wide throttle gets rid of that particular problem
)
I also believe that the 2 x 1.75" used even on the 3.8 Mk2 Jaguar Sedan was a cost thing (William Lyons was cost conscious)and gave a quoted 220 BHP (Gross I think) while the 3.8 E Type had 3 x 2" and with a slightly better head and higher compression gave 265 BHP. In this case I think the extra cost was an image factor rather than true engineering need.
Alec
if the question had been that I want to fit 2" S.U.'s then I would have said no, that 1.75" or 1.5" would be the choice but the engine alreadty has 2" which I believe will work if set up correctly and any faults remedied. (Incidentally, I do not consider leaking throttle shafts a big problem as it is at idle and low speed that they affect running. Drive with a wide throttle gets rid of that particular problem
I also believe that the 2 x 1.75" used even on the 3.8 Mk2 Jaguar Sedan was a cost thing (William Lyons was cost conscious)and gave a quoted 220 BHP (Gross I think) while the 3.8 E Type had 3 x 2" and with a slightly better head and higher compression gave 265 BHP. In this case I think the extra cost was an image factor rather than true engineering need.
Alec
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 