HealeyRick said:
There wasn't much else to find wrong with that car.
Aha! A challenge!
Looks like a nice, cosmetic resto--paint, engine, mostly--engine bay, boot and interior looks original. Hardly 'no expense spared,' though. They left the original, asbestos heat shields--nice touch. Looks like someone slapped a chrome or aluminum 'shield' on the seat outer brackets--a normal wear spot. Battery box not original, looks like there might be significant rust under the battery (battery leak at some point?). I like the rattle paint can top used for dust cap on the spare tire.
The rear door gaps look kinda big--esp. on the driver's side. Flex fan will be very noisy.
Closeup of the speedo is interesting. Needle doesn't rest on peg--may have calibration issues. Not sure the speedo needle is correct--don't know if the early instruments had the shiny, chrome insert on the needle. Small screws that hold speedo faceplate look to have been turned--someone's been inside the speedo.
For that price, seller has done a smart thing: taken a relatively clean, low-mileage car and tarted it up (polished brass radiator tank, polished copper pipes, excellent paint, new chrome wires, etc.). Wonder if anything was done to the engine besides cosmetics. No shots of underside--would like to see it.
All in all, though, not a bad car (except for the badge on the boot). Don't think I'd pay much over $40K for it, though. And, technically, isn't it a 'roadster' and not a 'convertible?'