• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

A modern parable

Bruce Bowker

Obi Wan
Offline
A Modern Parable.

A Japanese company ( Toyota ) and an American company (Ford Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile. The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up
of senior management was formed to investigate > and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the American team had 7 people steering and 2 people rowing. Feeling a deeper study was in order; American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the
boat, while not enough people were rowing. Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 2 area steering uperintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 2
people rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First Program,' with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rowers. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for
practices and bonuses. The pension program was trimmed to 'equal the competition' and some of the resultant savings were channeled into morale boosting programs and teamwork posters.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated, the American management laid-off one rower , halted development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and cancelled all capital investments
for new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses.

The next year, try as he might, the lone designated rower was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles,) so he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe equipment was sold and
the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India.

Sadly,

the End.

Here's something else to think about: Ford has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the US , claiming they can't make money paying American wages.

TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more
than a dozen plants inside the US
The last quarter's results:

TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits while Ford racked up
9 billion in losses. Ford folks are still scratching their heads, and collecting bonuses...
IF THIS WEREN'T SO TRUE IT MIGHT BE FUNNY
 
We really ARE our own worst enemy.

Soo much more disappointing in that WE started the whole thing with ingenious application of means and methods back at the end of the 19th century... that accelerated and became the model to lift the standard of living for a great portion of the world. argh.
 
:iagree:

Self-satisfaction, hubris, and resting on laurels - bad combination...

Gotta be hungry at times.
 
But this is supposed to be a HUMOR forum!
 
May not be as true as you might think. Ford has turned in a surprisingly strong quarter; and the chickens haven't come home to roost yet on Toyota's "sudden acceleration" problem, in spite of a record recall already affecting 4.2 million vehicles.

Toyota is still trying to blame floor mats, but the problem is obviously deeper than that ... is that a massive class-action lawsuit I smell ?
https://www.abc4.com/content/about_4/link...rKz47_TWxg.cspx

Irony is humor, right?
 
Ask Audi.
 
kellysguy said:
Never dun did dig that thar throttle-by-wire.

Well, that's about all there is out there now. You'll have to stick to older cars if you don't want the wire. When we first got the Mazda6, I found the drive by wire a little disconcerting, but after a couple of weeks, you don't even notice it anymore, even when going from cars without the wire back into the Mazda.
 
martx-5 said:
kellysguy said:
Never dun did dig that thar throttle-by-wire.

Well, that's about all there is out there now. You'll have to stick to older cars if you don't want the wire. When we first got the Mazda6, I found the drive by wire a little disconcerting, but after a couple of weeks, you don't even notice it anymore, even when going from cars without the wire back into the Mazda.

My C5 has fly-by-wire and I love it!
 
TR3driver said:
May not be as true as you might think. Ford has turned in a surprisingly strong quarter; and the chickens haven't come home to roost yet on Toyota's "sudden acceleration" problem, in spite of a record recall already affecting 4.2 million vehicles.

Toyota is still trying to blame floor mats, but the problem is obviously deeper than that ... is that a massive class-action lawsuit I smell ?
https://www.abc4.com/content/about_4/link...rKz47_TWxg.cspx

Irony is humor, right?

There have been some horrific accidents with people getting killed from this problem. When you read that link, it talks of people going 90-100 mph with their feet jammed on the brakes trying to stop. I have to ask the question <span style="font-weight: bold">"why didn't they just put the car in neutral??" </span>The engine would have bounced off the rev limiter, but the power brakes and power steering would still be working. Plenty of control to get to the side of the road and shut the engine off.
 
martx-5 said:
I have to ask the question <span style="font-weight: bold">"why didn't they just put the car in neutral??" </span>
Excellent question. I don't understand all the details, but the short answer appears to be "because the car will not let them"; or possibly just because the sequence required is so confusing/nonintuitive that the casual driver doesn't know how.

No doubt some people simply don't think of it (I wouldn't expect my wife to do so, for example, as shifting to neutral is not "how you stop the car"); but one of the people killed was a 20 year veteran of the California Highway Patrol. Sure seems like he would be more adept at dealing with unusual emergency situations than your average driver, but he was apparently not able to shift to neutral or turn off the ignition.

Or maybe he did manage to shift to neutral before the crash, but with the brakes already overheated (witnesses reported them "being on fire") and no power boost, not been able to stop the car. Top speed in a 350es is a whole lot more than the 100mph or so he was reportedly doing when the car left the road.
 
Sooo.... this is how the machines take over, huh? :jester: :smirk:
 
Yup. 1984 came & went, but we haven't gotten to the Forbin project yet. "I bring you peace."
 
I'm gettin scared now...

Hold me, Randall? :jester:
 
DrEntropy said:
Hold me, Randall? :jester:
-hdmgfk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
 
Randall;

I've heard that line so many times since the movie came out, I just want to unplug everything!!!!!!!!


DAVE :wall:
 
Sorry ... I was afraid most people wouldn't recognize this one:
iv2Xh7w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
 
Back
Top