Since this is all beyond my skill level (I'm learning), I have a great team helping me, in addition to the great forum team here. Here is where I'm at for now, I have not taken it out for my own test run yet. -The timing was set to 10 degrees BTDC with the vacuumretard disconnected.
-With the vacuum retard connected, timing SHOULD fall backto 4 degrees ATDC, a movement of 14 degrees, when everything is functioningproperly. Idle speed should be set to about 850 RPM with the timing atthis point.
-On my car, the vacuum retard is inconsistent in terms ofhow much it moves the timing. It usually ends up between 3 & 5degrees BTDC, a movement of only 5 to 8 degrees. We set the idle speed to850 RPM with the timing in this range. This is where we came up short. We did not verify where the timing ended up with the vacuum retardconnected. We only verified that the capsule held vacuum, moved thedistributor's breaker plate, & that it caused timing to move. Had weverified where the timing actually ended up with the vacuum retard connected,we would have realized a potential problem despite the fact that it ran fineduring our test drives.
-The reason that the car was failing to idle is that, undersome conditions, the vacuum retard would move timing more than it did when weinitially tuned the car. This is what happened when the car stalled &failed to hold idle after the first freeway run.
-On the second diagnosis, the car would idle sometimes,but then the idle speed would gradually fall until the car stalled. Wenoticed that, as the idle speed was falling, so too was the timing. Thisis where we picked up on the inconsistent performance of the vacuum retard.
-The reason I stated that it was a potential carb issue isthat the vacuum retard is only receiving 5"Hg of vacuum at idle. Although I did not find a spec for manifold vacuum, this sounds low tome, & IMO, the vacuum retard is not receiving sufficient vacuum to performconsistently. Other than an internal engine problem, which I don'tbelieve you have, a vacuum leak, which I could not find, I could not think ofanother reason why manifold vacuum would be that low.
-The only other possibility that I can think of is a problemwith the distributor's internals preventing the vacuum retard from moving thebreaker plate consistently. However, the centrifugal advance moves fine.
-Because the car is not subject to emissions testing, weelected to disconnect the vacuum retard, plug the fitting on the carb, &set the idle to 850 RPM with the timing at 10 degrees BTDC. With thissetup, the car performs well & idles consistently under all conditions.
-If anyone has any further input, I'd appreciate it.