• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)

What year did MBG do away with Chrome numbers?

Share this page

W

Wingtip

Senior Member
Silver
Offline
If I ever wanted to buy an MGB it would probably be a chrome bumper version. Just curious when they stopped with Chrome bumpers?
 
I believe September 1974 saw the introduction of the rubber bumpered, raised ride height MGB, referred to as the 1974-1/2. This was also the last of the dual HIF carbs for the North American market, as the 1975 model saw the introduction of the single Zenith-Stromberg carb and the combination intake/exhaust manifold.

There were two variants of the 1974 MGB before that....one with a chrome overrider with a black insert....and one with large rubber blocks as overriders (lovingly referred to as "Sabrinas".)
 
Would you say then that pre-74 (or earlier) are the more desirable variants? My Spitfire has the big ugly rubber over-riders and I hate them! If I buy an MG I would rather get one without the big blocks you describe. The small rubber inserts I could handle. I have some other questions, but I'll post in a new thread.
 
Again, beauty is in the eye...

I prefer the earlier chrome bumper models without the "Sabrinas". And the earliest ones had simple chrome overriders without the small rubber inserts.
 
The chrome bumper overriders are all removable and essentially interchangeable, so you can always swap to your preferred style. I've got the ones with the small black inserts on my car (as original) but may eventually swap in the earlier style ones as they're a bit smaller.
 
Aside from the extra weight, a rubber bumper MGB can be made very nice to look at. Actually, I personally like the looks of this one! The painted bumpers give the design a nice smooth flow. JMHO. PJ

For some reason, this looks like it was taken at the entrance to MG 2006! Rick, what do you think?

 
PAUL161 said:
Aside from the extra weight, a rubber bumper MGB can be made very nice to look at. Actually, I personally like the looks of this one! The painted bumpers give the design a nice smooth flow. JMHO. PJ

For some reason, this looks like it was taken at the entrance to MG 2006! Rick, what do you think?

Click to expand...

Yes...that was indeed taken at the entrance to the showfield "on Cosby" for MG2006.

As you know, I like body coloured rubber bumpers...the flow into the body lines is just right in my opinion...both front and rear.
 
If I wasn't so wrapped up in redoing this TF, I believe I'd find a late RB model with a perfect body and build another B with a V8/V6 conversion. I have everything to do it, other than the body. Oh well, that's all I need, another project! I told the wife a while back, that I'm thinking of going back to work, just to get a rest!! :laugh: PJ
 
PAUL161 said:
Aside from the extra weight, a rubber bumper MGB can be made very nice to look at. Actually, I personally like the looks of this one! The painted bumpers give the design a nice smooth flow. JMHO. PJ

For some reason, this looks like it was taken at the entrance to MG 2006! Rick, what do you think?

Click to expand...

I'm assuming that isn't a factory option? That looks good, but wouldn't cracking of the paint on a rubber bumper be a concern?
 
Wingtip said:
I'm assuming that isn't a factory option? That looks good, but wouldn't cracking of the paint on a rubber bumper be a concern?
Click to expand...
Rubber bumpers were all black from the factory. Modern paints designed for bumpers should keep cracking from happening if you were to go the painted route.
 
With the newer paints and the fact that the "rubber" bumper isn't as flexible as some might imagine, the paint holds up very well. I read somewhere there is an alternative, a fiberglass replica of the original front bumper, possibly the rear also. This would be great, as the original bumper must weigh around 50 lbs. I have some, just never weighed them. PJ
 
Yup! The wifes 72, ended in 74-1/2.

 
The painted bumpers on the RBB do look nice!

You can start with an RBB and spend a lot of money to upgrade the engine and suspension just to get back to the stock spec of the early cars, or you can just buy an early CBB to start with and spend some of the money on improving it from stock.

Styling beauty is on the eye of the beholder and both have their advocates, but performance is undeniably inferior in the late cars. If performance isn't your priority then just go with whichever one looks nicest to you.
 
Wingtip said:
Now that's nice! I could live with the small rubber inserts on the overriders! I see they have 3 wiper blades too - just like a Jag XKE!
Click to expand...

North American spec MGBs had three wiper blades from 1969 onwards. Federal regulation regarding % of windscreen swept.
 
Wingtip said:
I'd guess it's because of the short windscreen height?
Click to expand...

No, it's because the Feds passed a requirement that a certain percentage of the total glass area need to get wiped in all cars and you can't comply with that with only two wipers (so in a sense I guess you are right, the height of the windshiled did mandate that solution). Its like the MGB being raised up on the suspension and losing much of the handling capability they'd formerly had.
 
PAUL161 said:
Yup! The wifes 72, ended in 74-1/2.

Click to expand...

Wife's 71 B is also a fish mouth which we love.
Even has the over-riders and same head lamps.
That is one nice looking 72 ya got there.
 

Attachments

  • 29291.jpg
    29291.jpg
    85.6 KB · Views: 143
Back
Top