Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> Here's How << 
disap-POINTED! That's what NASA would prefer those images to be... lacking those points. But a refracting telescope with the same magnification would be an impossible mass to lift to terminal V. By a LOT. The largest refractor is a 40" main lens and weighs tons. Less powerful than Hubble, too.I'm still disappointed
If you read far enough in the article, it's not caused by the struts because there are only 4 struts. But, it sometimes happens with struts. It also happens with a segmented shutter aperture. Webb has 6 segments to its aperture, hence 6 spikes.I'm going to call BS, since the same effect has been used on the Hubble.
What the artical is saying, is it's caused by the unique construction of the mirrors and struts.
I'm not a telescope optics expert but not convinced.
Is this similar to the "ray" effect you sometimes get if you take a photo of a bright pinpoint light source with the lens aperature closed down a bit?
That’s what Siri is forAnd yet if T-Rex had that Iphone it would be incapable of using it since with those little tiny arms it wouldn't be able to hold it out far enough to see what it was typing...
And yet if T-Rex had that Iphone it would be incapable of using it since with those little tiny arms it wouldn't be able to hold it out far enough to see what it was typing...
Are you Sirius about space?Big deal. Space.
Gas is down to about $4.60 around here.
End of report.