Re: 69 TR6 static vs moving timing - what is bette
RonMacPherson said:
A quick note on the octane thing. That rating has also changed over the passage of time. Now the octane rating is assessed by adding the two octane ratings(US and European) ad dividing them. So what used to 95 is now around 90, If I remember fight.
The 6 engine, unless compression and bmep overlap(radically altered camshaft) are altered, then maximum advance should be 32 @ 3500. That isn't static.
So use a timing light with an advance feature to dial your timing in. That will set up your idle timing. Slightly different curve if you have an earl PI engine, but basically curves are close.
Hi Ron,
There are several octane rating systems. The research octane number (RON) the motor octane number (MON) & an aviation octane number.
The RON is determined under ideal conditions & is higher, maybe 96. This is the published number that is used in Europe.
The published USA octane number is the average of the research octane number (RON) possibly 96 & the motor octane number (MON) possibly 88. ((Ron + MON)/2). Thus the USA published pump octane number of 92 would be the equivalent to the 96 European number.
Earlier USA octane numbers were also published as (RON) & thus higher.
I certainly agree that the timing should be set at a maximum, static plus centrifugal, no vacuum, of around 32 degrees at 3,500 to 4,000 rpm. If an engine with 24 degrees of centrifugal advance (12 degrees distributor) were set at 15 degrees initial advance, the resulting total advance of 39 degrees would be dangerously high.
If a person really wants to run at 15 degrees initial, the centrifugal should be adjusted to limit it's advance to 17 degrees engine or around 8 or 9 degrees distributor.
Detonation at higher rpm due to over advance may not be heard, but it can do tremendous damage. The slight possible power advantage is not worth the risk.
D