Hi Guest!
Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
DerekJ
Luke Skywalker
Offline
Hi Jag lovers
Im visiting from the Austin Healey forum and have a question for you.
The Mark II 3000 was introduced with triple SU's. These lasted about 10 months and were replaced by twin SUs as originally featured on the 3000 MkI. Healey folklore says they were replaced because the triples were difficult to keep in tune. Not sure I believe this, Another theory is simply related to cost.... that 2 carbs were cheaper than three!
So the question is...in the Jag world was/is there ever any discussion about problems keeping triple SU's all in tune. I know they feature on several Jag models. After all, once set up properly SUs pretty much stay that way.
thanks in advance
Im visiting from the Austin Healey forum and have a question for you.
The Mark II 3000 was introduced with triple SU's. These lasted about 10 months and were replaced by twin SUs as originally featured on the 3000 MkI. Healey folklore says they were replaced because the triples were difficult to keep in tune. Not sure I believe this, Another theory is simply related to cost.... that 2 carbs were cheaper than three!
So the question is...in the Jag world was/is there ever any discussion about problems keeping triple SU's all in tune. I know they feature on several Jag models. After all, once set up properly SUs pretty much stay that way.
thanks in advance
