• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

Spark plug heat range

Share this page

M

Member 10617

Guest
Guest
Offline
Viv says that he uses and prefers NGK BP5HS spark plugs over Champion. I see that TRF sells NGK BP6HS spark plugs.

I assume that the difference between that "BP5HS" and the "BP6HS" has to do with the spark plug heat range. Viv says he prefers a slightly hotter plug.

Does this mean that the PB5HS is hotter than the BP6HS? In other words, are the NGK plugs "colder" as the number rise?

From what I have learned, if you drive your car short distances at relatively low speeds, a hotter plug is better than a colder plug. Higher speed and longer drives justify a colder plug.

Any thoughts?
 
Lower number is hotter on NGK. Other way around on Champions. I don't like trying to tune with heat range. If everything else is right, the factory recommendation should work all around. I do like the newer tiny electrode plugs as they tend to be less prone to fouling. Especially since my carbs are old and out of tune. :smile:
 
Dale,

Thanks. That's what it looked like to me, but I couldn't be sure.

Since TRF only sells NGK BP6HS, I take it this would be considered "factory recommendation." I am assuming, however, that no harm will come to the engine if I bump it up a bit to NGK BP5HS... and perhaps it will perform better the way I drive my car (short distances, slow speed).
 
Hi George,

As far as I can find, the NGK BP5HS has a reach of 12.7 mm (1/2 inch) and the NGK PB5HS also has a reach of 1/2 inch. Both have a 14mm thread. This would make them equivalent, I assume, except for the 5 being a little hotter than the 6.

The 1.5 inch reach must be a typo. In fact, that chart is very hard to interpret because it doesn't include the "P" and the "S" in the designations.
 
Back
Top