• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

TR6 Some questions from a new TR6 owner

Share this page

MadRiver

MadRiver

Jedi Knight
Country flag
Offline
Howdy all!

Well, we finally took delivery of my girlfriends 1971 TR6 two days ago. It's a good driver in Laurel Green, black interior and overdrive -- the latter is producing some serious jealousy on my part! :smile: The car will need some cosmetic tinkering here and there, but nothing major, and is in phenominal mechanical shape, and bloody fast! The engine was rebuilt a few years back, and whoever did it did a nice job -- it's noticably faster than my 250. Can you see some of that jealousy creeping in again?

Anyway, being new to the TR6 world, we've got a couple of questions. The first thing we noticed is that the steering wheel squeeks whenever it is turned. I know that my 250 is retained by a metal strap with felt. Does the 6 have the same arrangement, and if so, could the sqeeking (which does not sound like metal on metal) be the result of really worn felt?

Second, should there be a spring mounted somewhere to help the boot lid pop up a bit when the button is pushed?

Third, the car is a 1971, but lacks the two small reflectors that I understand were mounted below the tail lamps that year. Does anyone have any definitive information about what range of commission numbers had these?

Thanks all!

B.

PS -- Might just have to call Quantum and see if they have an overdrive transmission in stock for my TR250!
 
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:]Second, should there be a spring mounted somewhere to help the boot lid pop up a bit when the button is pushed?
[/QUOTE]

No spring, but if the trunk lid seal is old and lost it's elasticity, replacing it will cause the lid to pop up a bit when unlatched.
 
MadRiver said:
PS -- Might just have to call Quantum and see if they have an overdrive transmission in stock for my TR250!
Click to expand...

You should put in your order now if ya want to install it this winter.
I know John has a large back log!
 
Your squeaking steering wheel may be caused by either a worn steering column bushing or a "too short" steering column. The TR6 has a collapsible steering column that can actually be adjusted for length. You'll see a clamp by the brake booster that can be loosened by the allen nut and the regular nuts, and then the column can adjusted within a small range. I gave my steering wheel a good yank, just enough to clear a bit of binding between the steering wheel hub and the column and it's been squeak free ever since. Just don't forget to tighten the column when you're done! :smile:
 
MadRiver said:
Third, the car is a 1971, but lacks the two small reflectors that I understand were mounted below the tail lamps that year. Does anyone have any definitive information about what range of commission numbers had these?
Click to expand...
According to a notice reposted on the Triumphs Only web site, cars affected were CC 50958 to CC 52453, cars manufactured in Jan-Feb. 1970. Your car is well past that range, presumably, if it's a 1971.
 
It is just an MG part. Not all 71's have them. I think it was dealer installed and some owners said screw it.
 
TR6BILL said:
Pretty much, isn't the TR250 just a TR6 with Italian clothes?
Click to expand...


<span style="color: #CC0000">Bill,

My 69TR6 has many TR250 engine components,
the clutch/tranny is a TR4A.

d</span>
 
TR6BILL said:
Pretty much, isn't the TR250 just a TR6 with Italian clothes?
Click to expand...

Indeed, but really the other way around -- the TR6 is pretty much a TR250 with a body by Karmann! Especially the earlier cars. The only real differences I've found (other than the coach work, of course) are minor litte details -- but of course, that's the stuff I'll have questions about! :smile:

Thanks so much, guys!
 
TR6BILL said:
Pretty much, isn't the TR250 just a TR6 with Italian clothes?
Click to expand...
Let's do a poll, how many people have Italian styled clothes and how many have German styled clothes?

Sorry, couldn't resist; I'll get my coat.
 
Andrew Mace said:
MadRiver said:
Third, the car is a 1971, but lacks the two small reflectors that I understand were mounted below the tail lamps that year. Does anyone have any definitive information about what range of commission numbers had these?
Click to expand...
According to a notice reposted on the Triumphs Only web site, cars affected were CC 50958 to CC 52453, cars manufactured in Jan-Feb. 1970. Your car is well past that range, presumably, if it's a 1971.
Click to expand...


My 71 has them. It is comm # 57627, build Oct 70, titled as 71. What that means is anybody's guess! My car has an earlier motor- TR250 era. Someone may have swapped the comm plates to a different body- or someone just saw another car with them and thought they should be on there.

On 2nd thoughts, maybe the interpretation of the TSB/recall shouldn't necessarily be that only those cars (Jan-Feb 70) had them. Perhaps later cars had them put on before the car was sold. Then in the longer term maybe there was a modification to the reflector in the light cluster, or some other change to the law or way it was enforced. In any case, I couldn't see myself going out of my way to add them... that's just me though!

Pete
 
Agree. The "250" was a transition car. BL already knew that and Karman was already designing the "6" at the end of "4A" production. As usual, BL didn't want to spend bugger all if it wasn't necessary. I believe as the yeyars go by the "250" will increase in value faster than any other model except perhaps an original long-door "2" or a proper "5".
 
I've read that the 6 was a partial redesign of the 4 because Triumph was, lets say, frugal. Karman redid the rear and front end of Giovanni Micholetti's beautiful TR4 design. It can pretty much be confirmed by looking at a TR4 and then looking at a TR6..I think it all worked out wonderfully. Imagine if they decided to do a complete redesign for the TR6, no, I don't want to go there, the possibilities are to horrific. This is really taking your Italian clothes to the German tailor and telling him to make them look fresh, maybe, ?
 
Back
Top