• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

So called crank grinders

Country flag
Offline
I do a certain portion of amchine work in house, most of all the head work, and rod work, I do out source boroing, line boring, and crnakshaft grinding. The crankshaft grinder I use, Spartan Crankshaft is one of the best I ever seen, I've been using them for close to 20 years, all they do is crankshafts, and they know how to do them right. Crankshaft grinding is a art form as foar as I'm concerned, I could let the same machinist that does my broing and line boring do my crnaks, but the bottom line is he maybe does 2-3 crnaks a month, where Spartan does dozen fo crank weekly, so you can fiquire out real quick who will do the better job. I blueprint everything I built, so I tell the crnak grinder what number I wont them to hit, so I get the exact clearence I want, a good grinder will hit your numbers by +/- .0002", my guys seldomly ever are as much as .0002" off, normally within .0001, that in short is outstanding work. Another big deal about crnak grinding putting the fliet radius on the edge of the journals back, and this is where alot of 'so called" crank grinders suck, they square off the radius, or they don't want to dress their grinding wheels so they make a few steps at the end to sorta create a radius. When the radius is not put back properly this cause a stress riser, most all cracks in crnakshaft happen at the radius on the journals, the better the radius is the less chance a crank will crack there.

Ray sourced a 1275 engine core form a buddy of mine, none of us knew any history about Ray's core. When I got the core apart, the bores were still standard. but someone had ground the crank .010/.010, and the radiuses looked terrible, and I just didn't want to take Ray's motor to a .020/.020 crnak, so I had a nice std/std crank in my stash and we used that. Well we got my lathe repaired the other day, and was looking for something to do to try it out, so the crank that originally came out of Ray's core engine was used for a polish job to give the lathe a try out. Once I polished the journal up, I saw what I thought was couple of scratches on the #4 rod journal, closer inspection proved they were cracks not scratches, one coming form the radius, about 3/8", and the ohter came off the same radius at a angle of about 3/4" (biggest crack I ever saw in a crank. The mroal to all this was, whoever ground this crnakshaft originally was a lazy "you know what", he stepped the radius and for all prectical purposes wiped it away, and this shotty job caused this crnakshaft to crack, and it's a wonder it dodn't break in the block while the engine was still running.

The moral of all this is to find out in your area who does the good crank work, where do the racers take thier cranks, and that's who you want grinding your crank. Don't think just because a machiinst has a crank grinder and does crank grinding he can actually do a good job of it. A good question for a machinist who grinds cranks is to ask them how they do their radiuses on the journal, if you get a bunch of hee-hawing, then run :smile:


Sidenote, only twice have I ever sourced a already ground crankshaft from British parts vendors who use what ever shop is near them mostly to do the machine work, both big names in the business, I used neither of these cranks as they were sent to me (crappy radiuses, and journal sizes all over the place) both were re-done by my guys.
 
Listen to Hap, guys....he's proven that lesson to me several times....I now use only the hot rod machine shop in town - & am willing to wait until they get to my stuff......everything Hap told me to look for in a properly ground crank, my guys do.
 
Been there Hap. Good Advise. I have sent my crank half way across the country to supposed specialty shops to find the clearances are all wrong when it was returned. Last time I brought it to a reputable Race shop an hour away and his specs were right on :wink:
 
And once again Hap is the man. Thanks Hap, I learn more from your ramblings than seems possible.
 
Geeze, Hap!

You are making me paranoid. I'm using a different machine shop than I have in the past because the other shop was always backlogged with race motor$. (hallmark of a good shop?) Anyway, I talked to my machinist that I was concerned about having I proper radius on the crank. However, I didn't ask how he would be doing it. So I'm sitting here with my lighted magnifying glass and micrometer checking my crank.

It looks good to me, but I'm glad you posted this so that I'll be able to be very specific next time. When I start my final assembly I'm going to try and take my time and ask questions and post pictures here.
 
Thanks for the info.

I have two 1275s and I plan to rebuild one over the Winter for my new vintage racer so I'm thinking about this stuff right now.

One of my 1275s is a '67 with the nitrided crank (I think "EN40B").
Is there any special difference with grinding the nitrided crank?

Also, what's a "wedged" crank?

Thanks.
 
aeronca65t said:
I have two 1275s and I plan to rebuild one over the Winter for my new vintage racer so I'm thinking about this stuff right now.

One of my 1275s is a '67 with the nitrided crank (I think "EN40B").
Is there any special difference with grinding the nitrided crank?

Also, what's a "wedged" crank?

The coveted EN40B crank will have those exact letters cast into it, so if you see that there, you got, one, otherwise you'll see EN16T, which it still very acceptable for racing. The EN40B 1275 crank was nitrited from the factory, nitriting is a surface harness treatment, that makes the crnak journal harder so they wear slower, othe than the surface being harder, they grind the same way. The EN40 part of the name is the steel type, EN40 is very simiar to 4130, which is what aftermarket companies make racing rods and crnak out of. EN16 is still very tough steel, and that crnak is tuffrited form the factory, which is somewhat like ion nitriting today, so still a good hardness treatment.

A wedged 1275 crnak is how you ligten a 1275, by taking off the extra weight it has around the journals (which is where you want to remove weight on crank, some cranks need very little removed from this area, a 1275, and a MGB flat side cranks have alot of material to remove form this area) The term "wedged" comes form the ending shape of the counter throws when you done lightening. Basic'y wedging is done on a mill with the crnak in v blocks, the crnak is rotated to angle in the v block in which the mass or material at the journal is removed, but by the timew you get to the end of the counter throw, the cut is nothing more than a skim cut, it leaves the counter thorw looking like the shape of a piece of pie or a wedge, hence the name. Not amny folks do this anymore, there's alot to this job, balancing after the wedge job is pretty intense as well. I've been wedging crank for a while now, I guess I've probaby done 50 or more. Here's a look at a wedged 1275 crank that I did in the crank balancer.
 

Attachments

  • 14416.jpg
    14416.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 300
Thanks for the reply and excellent explaination of wedging.

I am hoping to build a "hobby" engine with maybe 80 HP or so for my A-35. I don't want to go too cheap, but I'm not building a National-level racer either.

I'm thinking of something like a Kent 276 or 286 (scatter) cam and AE hepolite pistons (about 9.5 CR).
I'll run race gas, but since this is vintage, I don't expect to see much over 6500 rpm.
Based on your explaination, I'm guessing I could skip the wedging and just have things balanced.

Again, thanks!
 
Yeah, wedging the crank is going the final step, it lighten the 1275 crankshaft about 2 or so pounds, which doesn't net you anymore horsepower just gets you to what you've got a little quicker.

If you use the AE 21253 piston, it will do what you want, we use it in alot of the SCCA "limited prep" 1275 H-production engines, it doesn't coat a arm and leg, and it is strudier in the oil control land area, and has a higher compression hieght, Ray's block ended up being .012" negative deck with the AE 21253, on the race engine we tend to set them at about .005" negative deck, and with a skim cut on the head, you're all over 11.0 to 1, A series engine love compression ratio, and 11.00 to 1 is nothing for one on race gas, if put together right, it should last forever. The SCCA LP/HP 1275 engine see a red line of 7000-7500 rpms, and we've never had a piston failure from a AE 21253. I like the AE21253 so much I use it in my street engine, it maybe 75.00 more than the lower compression height AE 21251, and that my friend is cheap horsepower, Ray's engine should sneak in just under 10.0 to 1, the 231253 with a virgin block and head deck claims 9.75 to 1, more like 9.5 to one, so if your decks are good and straight this piston will save you money on decking as well. Can't really say enough good about the AE 21253, it's a tough little piston, lighter than most of the others, and real good bang for the buck.

I use APT's cams for the street, David offers a trusted product. I normally go for the VP276 cam and that is what we are using in Ray's engine, if I were going racing thought, I tend to grab a bit more gusto, I like the Comptune CT295, with stock rocker arms that put to about .450 lift, makes for a nice reliable race engine. I loved to use APT for race cams as well, they just don't have anyhting that lifts high enough for me, I never have any luck dealing with Elgin, so I stick with billets from Mike Miller and Comptune for my race cams, not cheap, but good stuff. I highly recommend APT CF-04 chilled iron lifters as well. Hope this helps.
 
Hap, at 9.5 can you use premium unleaded gas, or should you use race gas???
 
vagt6 said:
Hap, at 9.5 can you use premium unleaded gas, or should you use race gas???

No, at 9.5 to 1, you may even be able to get by with regular unleaded, premium would be the right choice though. Compression ratio also work differenbtly when it comes to dispalcement, meaning smaller can usally get by with more CR, than larger displacement. There are plenty of guys out there running Spridget at 10.5 to 11.0 on pump gas that's for sure pushing the envelope, but they are doing it, 9.5 to 1 is rather conservative actually.
 
Anybody can rate a thread using the drop down box at the top.
 
we used to be able to sort by rating...it was a nice feature.

mark
 
Hap, from my trying to contact Elgin, I am told he is retired. No more cams or lifters. Sad, as he was a master...
 
Anything started by Hap is automaticly 5 stars. Why, I said so.
 
Hap's post are the sort of thing I re-read four or five times, learning something new everytime, and still only comprehending 25% of it. They should be copied to the Wiki or something for easy surfing in the future.

Keep educating us Hap!
 
Yep, we're lucky to have expert wrenchers like Hap here.

Hap, thanks for all your schoolin'! :yesnod:
 
Back
Top