• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

San Francisco de Asis - I messed up

Basil

Administrator
Staff member
Boss
Offline
I had this grand plan to take a night shot of a little Catholic church that's about 30 minutes north of us. I had been there before and thought that it would be a cool foreground for some star trails (I've never tried star trails until now). I contacted the Priest in charge of this little church / cemetery, Fr Sisnaros, and not only did he give me permission to do the shoot out there after hours, but turns out he's a photography bug also and came out for the first few hours to help and also take some photos himself.

OK, I messed up - but I think the result was still kinda cool. With the help of Father Adrian Sisnaros, I took this image of the San Francisco de Asis church in Golden a couple nights ago. Father S was nice enough to come out during the early stages of my shoot and help me. He turned off some of the outside lighting and opened the doors and put some low level lights on inside which really added to the picture.

I then spent the night there (ever spend the night in the dark - by yourself - in a cemetery? :scared: ) to get some star trail images behind the church (actually it's around 1000 separate exposures all blended together to form the trails). I was really bummed when I got home and discovered all the star images were badly out of focus. Somehow, after I set sharp focus on the stars, the focus ring must have gotten bumped because the stars in all the images were out of focus. Nevertheless, I blended the star images to give this result of "fat" star trails. I'm going to go out and try a re-do to get properly focused stars, but I thought the end result of my mistake was still kinda cool.

Golden Church-November 15, 2023--Editps Large.jpeg
 
I'd bet that if you hadn't said you messed up, we'd think you planned it that way. Looks great to me - and the interior lighting in the chapel really adds depth.

Well done!
Tom M.
 
List it as a Happy Accident. There's a LOT going on in that frame, too. 👍
 
I almost spat my coffee all over my screen. That is insane!

We've all seen star trail photos before but yours is beautifully unique. A definite keeper!
 
I'm not a photographer, and I'm really interested - why are the different star trails different colors?

Is this due to the long exposure, revealing the "color" of each star?
 
I'm not a photographer, and I'm really interested - why are the different star trails different colors?

Is this due to the long exposure, revealing the "color" of each star?

Because.
 
I had this grand plan to take a night shot of a little Catholic church that's about 30 minutes north of us. I had been there before and thought that it would be a cool foreground for some star trails (I've never tried star trails until now). I contacted the Priest in charge of this little church / cemetery, Fr Sisnaros, and not only did he give me permission to do the shoot out there after hours, but turns out he's a photography bug also and came out for the first few hours to help and also take some photos himself.

OK, I messed up - but I think the result was still kinda cool. With the help of Father Adrian Sisnaros, I took this image of the San Francisco de Asis church in Golden a couple nights ago. Father S was nice enough to come out during the early stages of my shoot and help me. He turned off some of the outside lighting and opened the doors and put some low level lights on inside which really added to the picture.

I then spent the night there (ever spend the night in the dark - by yourself - in a cemetery? :scared: ) to get some star trail images behind the church (actually it's around 1000 separate exposures all blended together to form the trails). I was really bummed when I got home and discovered all the star images were badly out of focus. Somehow, after I set sharp focus on the stars, the focus ring must have gotten bumped because the stars in all the images were out of focus. Nevertheless, I blended the star images to give this result of "fat" star trails. I'm going to go out and try a re-do to get properly focused stars, but I thought the end result of my mistake was still kinda cool.

View attachment 94084
So, is that small curve in the center of the star trails Polaris? If so, that would mean it's not "true North."
 
So, is that small curve in the center of the star trails Polaris? If so, that would mean it's not "true North."
Yes it is Polaris. Polaris is very close to true north but it is not true north exactly. When I am doing Milkyway shots using my star tracker, I align it with true north. I have an app that shows me where I need to place Polaris in the tracker scope reticle so the the tracker will be pointing exactly at true north. The location you place Polaris depends on your latitude/longitude and time of day. In this example I just entered a random lat/long. The X shows where I would need to put Polaris in the tracker scope in order to be pointed at true north
IMG_3355.png
 
I'm not a photographer, and I'm really interested - why are the different star trails different colors?

Is this due to the long exposure, revealing the "color" of each star?

Because is always a good answer, but a slightly more scientific reason.... is the temperature of the star.
1700545727908.png

For way more information than you are probably interesting in:


 
70herald said:
Because is always a good answer, but a slightly more scientific reason.... is the temperature of the star.
<snip>
For way more information than you are probably interesting in:

Yiz, did you follow that "Because" link? ;)
 
Yiz, did you follow that "Because" link? ;)
Well obviously not.... and having teenagers around the house means "because" is an entire answer which doesn't tell you anything but that is all you're getting. In fact you should clearly be happy that they even bothered to acknowledge your existence enough to answer at all. So it didn't even occur to me that I should look for a link. -- oh and my teens are still great kids even if they may not be the best communicators.
 
Last edited:
I have just purchased a gopro, to take sneeky vids of the daughters performances,
It has time lapse setting on it from 4 Secs to 1 hour, I think i might have a go at this, see what it looks like in a video,
Not sure if it can be set to take still photos at specific timing,
Looks realy interesting.
 
Back
Top