Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
Healey Nut
Luke Skywalker
Offline
75G's and he will give you the hatchet job frame rail patch job no charge . Some people ???? Clueless https://cgi.ebay.ca/ebaymotors/1960...:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649&forcev4exp=true
-
Hey Guest!
British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Red bn7
- Thread starter Healey Nut
- Start date
Share this page
Offline
Now, now... vendor-bashing is against the rules. Let's keep it objective and factual.
Bob_Spidell
Yoda
Offline
What could have damaged the rails so badly they needed patches??? Do you suppose for an additional $5K he'll get the fender spears on right?
Do like the polished bellhousing and gearbox, though.
Do like the polished bellhousing and gearbox, though.
British_Recovery
Jedi Warrior
Offline
This is the car that started my question a short time ago about CKD cars ( completely knocked down ) as checking on the car number, which happens to be a BT7#, an earlier ad by a different vendor claimed that this car was assembled in Mexico. Thus the misappropriation of BT7 rather than BN7. Contacting the current seller, I was basically cut off from asking any questions. There are some questions that a new buyer should ask. It may be a nice car, but at the asking price it should have a pure, documented history.
Bob
Bob
OP
Healey Nut
Luke Skywalker
Offline
Im betting that the original car was hit in the rear end and the frame from another car was very badly grafted onto the rear of the this car to make it driveable again .
OldRodders
Freshman Member
Offline
Hi From our experience here in the UK, I tend to agree that it looks like a 4 seater BT7 that has been cut and a new BN7 2 seater back end fitted with associated shroud.
The VIN is obviously from a left hand drive BT7 but the number 11857 could be either a BN7 or BT7 as both had similar number ranges.
I own a 1962 MKII BN7 which was built by John Chatham in 1989 and taken in the group of 9 Healeys to the USA to race in the 1990 UK-USA Challenge.
My car is to the same spec as DD300 the ex Le mans car and is running on triple Webers. Now slightly detuned to give 250bhp at the flywheel and 200bhp at the wheels.
Its pictured in John Chatham's book on page 110 registered then as URX10.
It may be of interest but its believed that more BN7's exist now than were built originally.
The VIN is obviously from a left hand drive BT7 but the number 11857 could be either a BN7 or BT7 as both had similar number ranges.
I own a 1962 MKII BN7 which was built by John Chatham in 1989 and taken in the group of 9 Healeys to the USA to race in the 1990 UK-USA Challenge.
My car is to the same spec as DD300 the ex Le mans car and is running on triple Webers. Now slightly detuned to give 250bhp at the flywheel and 200bhp at the wheels.
Its pictured in John Chatham's book on page 110 registered then as URX10.
It may be of interest but its believed that more BN7's exist now than were built originally.