• Hi Guest!
    If you appreciate British Car Forum and our 25 years of supporting British car enthusiasts with technical and anicdotal information, collected from our thousands of great members, please support us with a low-cost subscription. You can become a supporting member for less than the dues of most car clubs.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Group statistics

Members:
18
Threads:
1726
Messages:
4224
Discussions:
3
Photos:
114

Latest posts

Group events

Photography

Pulled out the Vivitar Series-1 200mm ∱ 3.0

DrEntropy

Great Pumpkin
Platinum
Country flag
Offline
Disappointed to find fungus in there. These with the D7500 in manual, 125th @ ∱8, ISO still at 800. A bit soft...

About five feet away:
SS2_5199sm.JPG


This to see DoF, and point-of-focus is not sharp. About 20' and both shots on tripod
SS2_5201sm.JPG
 
I guess after forty-five years being hauled around in a leather bag, and almost twenty being mostly sat on a shelf in Florida, I've little to whine over. They all paid for themselves many times over.
 
I guess after forty-five years being hauled around in a leather bag, and almost twenty being mostly sat on a shelf in Florida, I've little to whine over. They all paid for themselves many times over.
That's a bit much to ask of any lens me thinks. Had you lived in New Mexico or Arizona it probably would not have been too bad.
 
Same fleur, with the 70~300 DX set to 200mm. 1/200th @ ∱8 for settings. Much sharper, even hand-held.

DSC_0303sm.JPG
 
Looks about a stop darker than the first one.
Yup. Almost one stop from 125th sec. to 200th, to better compensate for hand-held.
 
Yes, ISO 800. Intended to keep all else consistent. The lighting yesterday was from overcast sky. Today the background area was in shadow.
 
The similar shot of the ferns with the zoom, same settings, and point-of-focus is much more obvious as well. Only difference is the top of this frame has sunlight hitting the greenery. DSC_0304sm.JPG
 
I just read an article on cleaning a lens of fungus. I didn't know it was possible.
> How to Remove Fungus from a Lens <
Or get a new lens. The Nikkor 180 f2.8 AIS has come down in price recently. I like mine a lot. DOF at 6' wide open is about a quarter inch.
 
Thanks for the link, Greg. Interesting.
I may disassemble the 200 and try the ammonia/peroxide bath. I've used ammonia on a Q-Tip before with mixed results, never "soaked" optics with the 50/50 mix tho. Worth a try. All three prime longer lenses have some degree of the stuff in them, would like to have use of them with the DSLR's now.

Funny he uses a Sharpie pen. I used those to cover over light scuff marks on parts of used lenses & cameras we'd get as trade-in gear in the store I'd worked in here in the '80's. Wouldn't take in any lenses with fungus, tho.
 
Well, it would seem consideration of use is needed as it has specific photographic use.

First impulse was "ox snot" but the NH3+H2O2 mix ain't that viscous.

On further consideration, it may be that elusive "Sharpening Fluid" ever-missing in the darkroom chemistry days. Like the Lucas wiring harness "smoke-in-a-bottle."
 
Kodak_1906.jpg
 
If you want to stick with the name Ox Snot you could add some Methyl cellulose to the formula. That'll get the consistency you're looking for.

I've used a granular form in the past to make blended drinks like daiquiris on set that will keep their form for hours.
 
And mashed potatoes for ice cream!
 
Back
Top