Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
regularman
Yoda
Offline
Be sure and put a big disclaimer with that morris, having been in several LBC rollovers and mishaps, I don't want to see anyone hurt and the other cars are much bigger on this side of the pond.
-
Hey Guest!
British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Midget vs Mini Autotest
- Thread starter Trevor Jessie
- Start date
Share this page
Roger
Luke Skywalker
Offline
Well written, weewillie. I don't think many people have autotested a Mini before passing judgment on what's possible and what's not. They're maybe more accustomed to later FWD sog-boxes.
And in case anyone forgot, Minis went back to rubber in 1971 after their none-too-succesful excursion into the hydrolastic world, starting in 1964.
And in case anyone forgot, Minis went back to rubber in 1971 after their none-too-succesful excursion into the hydrolastic world, starting in 1964.
regularman
Yoda
Offline
Hydrolastic rode much better on a trip than the cones IMHO, but most people just used their minis for short trips and the rubber cones definitely handled better. I want another mini.