Jim,
Yea, but when you turn the engine/transaxle around backward to keep it "mid-engine", you only have one very low forward gear and 5 reverses! Just kidding.
I really like the ideas everyone is coming up with. If all this seems so logical to us, why can't the factories see that logic too?
Without knowing anyone in a car company, I would bet the answer is MONEY. Every new car dealer in the US makes a substantial part of his profit on options, not the base-model car, and on financing, leasing, and dealer add-ons (the infamous undercoating/pinstriping ploy). In fact, try to find a stripped, base model of any make car at a dealer this weekend--with new models coming out in a few weeks--and you probably won't find one. They're all loaded up.
Rover makes a whole lot more profit on a 160-HP, 1.8L variable valve, AC, PS, PB, power window, AM-FM-CD, leather-seat equipped MGTF that would sell for $30K or more in the US than it does on a stripped down, 1.1L $13K Midget. And since both require very nearly the same build time on the assembly line, which would you build?
That's what happens when London School of Economics-educated bean-counters, instead of car enthusists, run a British auto company (substitute "Harvard Business School" with "American"). Of course, if we enthusiasts ran a car company, it would probably be flat broke inside 6 months!
Steve