Tophatchef
Jedi Hopeful
Offline
WOAH! I've been looking at previews of cars from 2010 on the web, and I decided to check what Jag has been up to. I'm cool with the xk, and xf, but what have they done to my lovely sedan that has history from over 40(?) years ago? It looks like a fine car, just not worthy of the title xj. It has nice features, nice engine (but probably REALLY bad gas mileage). It's just that certain things are expected when I think of a Jaguar xj, one, a leaper(although it's not necessary), separate headlights, and a more traditional body style. It's just quite shocking to still call it the xj, although they seem to have changed EVERYTHING about the car. Oh, and no Vanden Plas, what's up with that?