[ QUOTE ]
... Yes. it's a fine, straight car. but it is hardly a 20,000 original mile "unmolested" car.
[/ QUOTE ]
Some other observations. I suspect that the headlamp rims are wrong; this one probably should have the wide rims. I suspect the front apron is a replacement, with the very late "smooth" letters (oh, and the bottom edge of that apron doesn't look too promising). Carbs appear to be from an older TR3 or 3A ("banjo-bolt" type of fittings on the fuel line to float bowls). Bonnet appears to be from a pre-TS60000 car, as it doesn't seem to have the "raised base" under the hinge. No TRIUMPH script badge on the rear apron.
I'm sure there's other details...that may or may not be all that important to a potential buyer. That depends on how much a stickler one is for either "originality" or "correctness" (which I tend to me). All in all, it seems like a decent-looking car that merits close scrutiny by anyone wanting to purchase it (doesn't really look "bent" anywhere, but I'd want to check it thoroughly based on what I mentioned above about replacement panels)...and it certainly merits either much less verbiage from the seller or at least somewhat more, uh, honest verbiage. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif