• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Criminal Lawyers' Award

Steve

Moderator
Platinum
Country flag
Offline
A Charlotte, NC, lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.

The lawyer sued...and won!

In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The Judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire, and was obligated to pay the claim.

Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the "fires."

NOW FOR THE BEST PART...

After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.

This is a true story and was the 1st place winner in the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest.

Author Unknown
 
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif
Serves him right!!! He should have known better. Any lawyer that would have gotten up in court and said this under oath couldn't have been too good of a lawyer to start with.
 
Steve...is this recent...I think I read this some years past???
 
That story has been around for years. I remember hearing it at least 25 years ago, if not longer. Still a good one.

I was trying to be kinder...Jeff...yikes...Steve he's right though! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/yesnod.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hate to burst any bubbles, /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif but; /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/nonono.gif

https://www.snopes.com/crime/clever/cigarson.asp

Back to /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/driving.gif

Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

But still funny /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif

Mike
 
Back
Top