• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

But this is really, REALLY cool!

Saw that, too. The tail lights look like a '54 Ford.
 
That's not too far from me. If anyone on here buys it, I'll be happy to pick it up and put a few thousand miles on it for them! :laugh:
 
sp53 said:
Very cool. I cannot tell, is that really a tr3 engine? It must be. What else could it be?

Yep -

Vanguard

Click on the Vanguard model down the page...
 
sp53 said:
Very cool. I cannot tell, is that really a tr3 engine? It must be. What else could it be?
Well...almost! Really, it's more a "tuned" version of the Vanguard 2088cc engine as opposed to the stronger and more powerful 1991cc TR engine (100hp in TR3 spec.). Many of the bits are very similar, of course.

I recall doing a quick comparison of part numbers, using SPC's for both the Sportsman and the TR2/3, and there definitely are a number of part number differences.
 
:iagree:
 
I believe I saw that car at a Triumpest afew years ago. One on the San Diego events, perhaps. I does look a Ford that some one left in the rain- sort of shrunken. T.T.
 
sp53 said:
Very cool. I cannot tell, is that really a tr3 engine? It must be. What else could it be?

Remember, when you look at the literature, the TR3 engine is frequently refered to as a <span style="font-style: italic">Vanguard</span> motor.

So actually, its the other way around.

When I had my Phase 2 Vanguard, I was going to put a TR2 manifold on it so I could add SU carburators. The reason I didn't was that nasty 4 letter word: RUST

It had spent many years on salt ladden roads.
 
Back
Top