• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Group statistics

Members:
18
Threads:
1714
Messages:
4149
Discussions:
3
Photos:
94

Latest posts

Group events

Photography

Better than Tums for G.A.S

Basil

Administrator
Staff member
Boss
Offline
After much soul searching and watching about 300 YouTube review videos, I have decided to pull the trigger on TWO lenses:

1. Canon RF 70-200 f/4
My ultimate rational for the f4 vice the much more rxpensive f2.8 was that, if I’m being honest, the amount of times I would β€œneed” 2.8 are relatively limited. With the low light performance of the Canon R5, I can bump up the ISO in low light situations and, in the event there’s a bit too much noise for my taste, I can run it through Topaz Denoise. The only thing I’m really giving up then is a bit better background blur, but from the comparisons I’ve seen, I can live with the f/4 in this regard. The f4 version can still produce quite nice background blur and subject separation. Also, the f/4 is much smaller and lighter and, since I like to backpack, it will be easier to lug around.

Also, with the $ I saved, I have ordered a second β€œfun” lens:

  1. Canon RF 85 f/2 - This lens looks like an amazing prime for portraits and situations when I do want a bit more background blur and it has the added benefit of having macro capability, albeit not 1:1, but still should be fun to play with the macro capabilities.
I bought the 70-200 new and the 85mm refurbished from the canon store - still spent less than if I’d bought just the 70-200 f/2.8
 
Congratulations! Well reasoned decision! That 85mm should be a terrific "kid chaser" of an optic!

And "setteling" for the ∱4 longer lens is a wise choice. As you said, the difference in bokeh will be neglegible, noise can be mitigated with Topaz.

Anxious to see what you do with both.
 
And "setteling" for the ∱4 longer lens is a wise choice. As you said, the difference in bokeh will be neglegible, noise can be mitigated with Topaz.
Had the difference in price been a couple hundred, I might have gone ahead with 2.8 but the difference was more like $1400 and for my use cases (most of them) I could not justify that much more. If I were a professional wedding photographer, I could see paying the premium.
 
God forbid.
Must agree. BTDT. Too much work for too little reward. And every man-and-his-dog are in the game now.

Besides, I don't think a 70~200 would be a good lens for bride chasing.
 
Back
Top