Online
And possible tsunamis.
Dale - Bruce - you OK?
Dale - Bruce - you OK?
DNK said:How active is that area generally?
DNK said:How active is that area generally?
Basil said:Just read it was the worst earthquake there in 200 years.
aerog said:Basil said:Just read it was the worst earthquake there in 200 years.
Worst, yup.
No disrespect to those suffering through it, but much of Haiti usually looks like a massive quake just hit - which makes it all the worse.
DrEntropy said:With submarine earthquakes COME Tsunamis!!
aerog said:The Chilean 'quake in 1960 was also the highest magnitude earthquake ever recorded. The Alaskan Tsunami in '64 was from the largest recorded in North America and caused damage on the pacific coast too. The 2004 Tsunami in Thailand was an estimated 9.1-9.3. All of those tsunamis caused distant problems because there was no attenuating land-masses to lessen the blow and were caused by massive earthquakes that were "just right" to cause the tsunami.
California just had a 6.5 off shore of Eureka/Ferndale and Haiti was a 7.0. Neither resulted in any significant tsunami effects, not to mention the 30 or so 2.5-3.0 submarine quakes around Puerto Rico in the last 7 days.
Point is, it has to be the right kind of quake, in the right spot, under the right conditions to be a risk. Thankfully that risk is relatively low.
PS: They just had a 5.3 aftershock in Haiti.