• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

I think it's an A90 100-six

Andynerd

Freshman Member
Offline
My dad and me went to a scrap yard and found this Austin sitting there. The decals on the body show a 3000, A90 100six, and Austin of England. Now when looking for information on this car I have been coming up short. So anything you guys can tell me about this car would be great.
The one image with the brass plate is on the engine and it faintly says "Princess" on it. Don't know if that means anything.
Also I think the car is from 1956.
IMG_1942.JPG
IMG_1943.JPG

IMG_1952.JPG
IMG_1947.JPG

IMG_1951.JPG
IMG_1984.JPG
IMG_1985.JPG
 
Wow, nice score! Welcome to the forum; I hope that you stick around, so that we can all follow along with how the car progresses.

As it was your car that formed the basis for our sportscars, there should be a good deal of commonality in the mechanical bits.

I have to ask, is that an alloy rocker cover?

Here's basically the same engine, this out of a 1957 100/6, that I'll be rebuilding for a customer. Look familiar?

IMG_1385.sized.jpg


IMG_1387.sized.jpg
 
HA! That looks exactly the same! WOW! The only difference is that tube thing on the side of the engine there, the one that's on an angle? It's larger and straight down in the Austin we have. I also have no clue what it's called if you could tell me. There has been a lot done to the car since we got it, I will post more photo's tomorrow. So far the fuel pump isn't working, and the coil isn't outputting any power so this might be a problem. But we got a replacement 12V Lucas coil from an MG! The transmission isn't leaking fluid, the clutch still has pressure, the engine isn't seized and it turns over very well. The only problem seems to be with the fuel pump, coil, and generator. We tried to start it today, it turns over just no spark. Haven't tried the new coil, will tomorrow. My dad says it has to be running by Friday or the car is being scraped.

EDIT: Almost forgot, yes seems to be alloy.
 
I think you're referring to the oil filter cannister (which probably needs changing :wink: ).

DO NOT SCRAP THAT CAR, you must get it running!

Another area to look in, would be to clean the points inside the distributor. It's quite likely that they've built up a film, and are not making contact.

What part of Ontario are you in? I'm on the outskirts of Toledo, Ohio (quite near Detroit/Windsor).

That's way too rare of a car in North America, I sure hope that you decide to keep it around, or sell it to someone that will. Personally, I'm very curious to know how many shared parts there are with our Healeys; besides the engine, the basic transmission (which I see is column shifted), probably much of the front suspension, and surely all the electrical components.

If the rust isn't much worse than what I can see in your pictures, it doesn't look to be in too bad of shape at all.

Guys: notice the wavy grill bars? Like the 100/6 & 3000.
 
Hopefully we won't or we will part it or sell it to someone who knows what they are doing first. The problem is the floor panels are rusted out and the frame from the engine back is barely there. It needs to be boxed and welded which is going to cost $2000 and my dad really can't spend that money unless he sells his model A so at the moment even with the engine running I don't know how it's going to go from there.

Also a neat thing we found in the car was a coin from west Germany made in 1950. Now I heard that this car was made to go to Argentina so our idea is that a British soldier during the late occupation of Germany might have ordered the car (might explain the left hand drive) to go to Europe. Because during the occupation I heard that officers could have their cars flown there and back during there term. Also there is evidence that when the car came to Canada it could have come from the military air base in Trenton. Only a theory though!

The best part about the car is that the body is fine, the engine is great except for this ignition problem and that the every single original bling to the car from the Luca headlamps to the windshield are all original even some of the electrical is the original Lucas products. We are only missing the antenna.
 
Andy,

I think this is what you've got!

Cheers,

Ian

<span style="font-style: italic">As soon as the BMC business started to operate, two major new-model programs got under way - Morris beginning the design of their Oxford/Isis range, and Austin starting to develop the two cars eventually announced as the A40/A50 Cambridge and the A90 Westminster. In fact, although the A40/A50 Cambridge and the new Westminster cars looked as if they had the same bodyshells on different wheelbases, only the door pressings were common.

The A90 Westminster, announced as a last-minute show surprise in October 1954, was a direct replacement for the A70 Hereford, which was dropped to make way for it at Longbridge. It was also an effective replacement for the 2.6-litre A90 Atlantic, even though that car had been phased out two years previously. Such were the illogical ways of the young BMC organization that the A90 Westminster was also a direct competitor for the soon-to-be-announced Morris Isis, with which it shared the engine, gearbox and final-drive assemblies! In BMC at this time, the economics of scale were used in one direction - running gear - but not at all in respect of bodies, for the Isis and the Westminster had entirely different shells.

That of the A90 was a conventionally engineered unit-construction style, rather long and slim, and looking very similar indeed to the A50 Cambridge, although it had a much longer wheelbase and wider wheel tracks. Although there were many common features inside the two (A50 and A90) cabins - the same stylists and engineers obviously having been at work - the actual instrument layout was unique, though the same types of steering-column gear-change, heater and radio installation were used. The rear end style was almost identical, for the same type of 'cow hip' rear quarters and high-sill boot-lid opening were in evidence. The independent front suspension was developed from that of the obsolete A70/A90 Atlantic layout, and had the characteristic lever-arm damper/top wishbone installation. The rear suspension was stiffened up by means of an anti-roll bar.

The engine, of course, was all new, for this was the first mass-production application of the Morris-designed BMC C-Series six-cylinder unit. For the A90, it had a single downdraught Zenith carburettor and a peak power output of 85bhp, and it was matched by the new C-Series four-speed gearbox, which had baulk-ring synchromesh, and a selector mechanism, mounted in the side of the casing to make the provision of a steering-column change easy.

Although the original A90 was only to remain in production for two years (it was replaced by the longer-tailed and much improved A95 in the autumn of 1956), it also gave rise to the much faster A105 derivative, and indirectly to the Vanden Plas interpretation of that theme. One important mechanical improvement, phased in from the first weeks of 1956, was the option of the Borg-Warner overdrive, which worked on top, third and second gears. Like that also offered on the A50 Cambridge, this could be engaged so as to cut in automatically when the car's speed rose above 30mph and the throttle was momentarily eased.

Austin A90 Westminster specification

Produced: Longbridge, 1954-56. 25,532 A90 Westminsters of all types built.

General layout: Pressed-steel unit-construction body/chassis structure, in 4-seater, 4-door saloon style. Front-mounted engine driving rear wheels.

Engine and transmission: BMC C-Series engine, 6-cylinder, ohv, in-line. 2,639cc, 79.4 x 88.9mm, 85bhp at 4,000rpm; 124lb at 2,000rpm; 4-speed gearbox, no synchromesh on 1st gear; steering-column gear-change; optional overdrive (top and 3rd gears) from early 1956; live (beam) rear axle with hypoid-bevel final drive.

Chassis: Independent front suspension, coil springs and wishbones. Cam-and-peg steering. Rear suspension by half-elliptic leaf springs and anti-roll bar. Front and rear drum brakes. 6.40 - 15in tyres.

Dimensions: Wheelbase 8ft 7.75in; front track 4ft 3.5in; rear track 4ft 3.25in; length 15ft 2.25in; width 5ft 4in; height 5ft 3.75in. Unladen weight (approx) 2,912lb.

Typical performance: Maximum speed 86mph; 0-60mph 18.9sec; standing 1/4 mile 21.0sec: overall fuel consumption 20mpg.

Launch Price: ÂŁ792

Derivatives: A95 and A105 models (see separate entries) evolved from this design, which itself shared some panels and basic styling with the A40/A50 Cambridge models.

Fate: Discontinued in 1956 in favour of revised A95 model.</span>
 
Thank you for that information!! It gave me a lot of insight into this car! The only difference between this car and the one you described is that this car only has Reverse, neutral, drive, first, and second. It didn't have a fourth drive. I will post more pictures soon!
 
This is what I think you have , but I Know very little about the car. The brass plate on the engine and it faintly says "Princess" on it suggests this might be the case.


A90 six saloon
this particular model was originally ordered in what must be a very rare combination i.e.Vanden Plas spec. It is fitted with the Princess 2.6 .....Engine

------------------------ :cheers:---Keoke
 
Just a question about the coils, both coils are Lucas coils. One is the original and the other is from an MG, they both produce the same ohm values could that specify that they are both dead coils?

EDIT:They both read: 8 ohms from the middle to one of the side connections and no resistance between the two side connections.

EDIT: It matched the A90 more then the A95 really. It's only difference seems to be it's right hand drive!
 
IF they both measure about 3 OHMS then I would say they are
both OK.Remove and check a Sparking plug and see if it fires.
If it does with a hefty spark then your problem is Petro
related.---Keoke
 
WOO!! Went to the same junk yard and took a 12v coil and generator from a mini 1000. Then after hooking it all up it still didn't work. So I checked the leads. One lead goes perfectly to negative, no resistance, a seemingly good connection. The other one had no connection to the positive terminal. So I tested the connection with some of the wires that had no connection that we had yet to figure out. And what do you know one had a perfectly good connection to the coil's positive lead. So we hooked everything up, poured a little gas in the carb and it did a few putts spewed some fumes from a hole in the manifold and it came back to life!

Now we have to get the fuel pump working! Probably just needs new seals.

EDIT: Is the fuel pump electronic or mechanical?
 
On that engine, it may well be mechanical, mounted more or less, below the generator in this hole (our cars use an electric pump)...
 

Attachments

  • 22346.jpg
    22346.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 451
Thanks! That is what I thought I will take out the fuel pump tomorrow. Hopefully it will be easy to fix. The only problem is that it has no suction.
 
The fuel pump was an easy fix, took it out, cleaned it, then took off the top bolt and what do you know? It's caked with sediment. So I clean it all, put it together. And pump some gas from a can by hand and it works amazingly! Everything has been put back and hopefully tomorrow we will be able to run it.
 
This project and the car looks good. I really hope you can continue restoring it over time. If the car was stored with gas in it, I hope you flush the gas tank. It's likely filled with sediment and rust and varnish from stale gas. I wouldn't want to try to run the car from an unknown condition gas tank.
 
Back
Top