|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
#458774 - 05/18/08 12:02 PM
Really, how fragile are the new Elises?
|
Silver Member
Freshman Member
Registered: 03/01/08
Posts: 16
Loc: California
|
I am considering purchasing an Elise and may even use it as my daily driver. I have a Healey, Europa and a stiff M5, so I think I handle the ride. I love the bullet proof running gear of the Elise and owner loyality, but what concerns me is the seeming fragility of the chassis, or to put it another way the expense of accident repairs.
They are not inexpensive. Nice used examples exceed ~$30K. So why would a car such as the one here on ebay 300225037750, with what appears to have very minor damage, carry a salvage title. I have seen several of these examples. I am assuming that before it became a salvage vehicle, a "cut cost" insurance adjuster calculated the cost of repairs to exceed replacement. These guys are not likely to throw away $30K, so what am I missing here?
I understand the extruded frame is not fixable, but some the "totaled" cars appear to have cosmetic (clam) damage. Maybe it is more expensive and the pictures are masking what a personal inspection would not, but look at 300225037750 and tell me if it looks totaled.
I considered asking the question over at lotustalk, but value the opinions from those that are like me and understand the older cars.
One think I don't like about the internet is all the information. Before the internet, it was much easier to make a decision:)
Dean
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#458825 - 05/18/08 04:21 PM
Re: Really, how fragile are the new Elises?
[Re: MoPho]
|
Great Pumpkin
Registered: 09/15/05
Posts: 20644
Loc: Elsinore, DK
|
Lotus states that any body damage must be considered structural. The insurance companies seem to take it literally. I'd be VERY reluctant to take on an E-Bay car without a thorough inspection up-close and personal, let alone one like that. The body damage showing can be minor compared to what was REALLY bent. The clamshell just shows what I'd call an "entry wound". No telling what happened INSIDE the shell.
...just my 2p.
_________________________
'64 MGB '67 Lotus Elan S-3 DHC '69 Lotus Elan +2 '78 Alfa Romeo Spider-current Daily: O=\*/=O '84 300D Turbo:"Diesela"-SWMBO's Daily: OO|#|OO '66 Alfa Romeo GT - Upscale Yard Art: Oo=\*/=oO Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#460920 - 05/25/08 01:05 PM
Re: Really, how fragile are the new Elises?
[Re: Tullamore]
|
Jedi Knight
Registered: 05/19/06
Posts: 1012
Loc: NEBRASKA, USA
|
I'm still curious to hear the outcome on this Elise. Dean..did you check it out or just back-off or did any other BCF'er deal on it. My suspicion it had been stollen and the damage looks like under carriage like going over the center divide. I had a rod few years back that was stollen...go it back and it looked good as new...and it also could be classified as "ran and drove" like a locomotive... Engine and tranny were shot and required either complete rebuild or replacement. Needless to say the car was salvaged!!
_________________________
BIBBER - if the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy ....(Red Green) 1962 AH Sprite - Lady Cassandra 1966 Austin A35 Van - Wallace & Gromit 1983 911 Carrera Targa - Helga 1991 MBZ 500sl Roadster - Maltilda
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
9692 Members
49 Forums
52132 Topics
518823 Posts
Max Online: 385 @ 06/22/07 11:08 AM
|
|
|
|

by Dinoman
|

by Dinoman
|

by Dinoman
|

by Dinoman
|

by Dinoman
|
|
|